The latter I have never heard of, and the former I am noway ever going to put myself through.
That said, an ex of mine started dating a guy with the former after we split up, and she seemed very happy, so maybe there is something in it.
Could just be she was happy to be away from me though.
2007-11-11 15:07:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow! stable success with those. you could desire to pee in a heat bowl of water everytime for months earlier the stinging is going away. And no intercourse for a 365 days so it could heal with out an infection. i could say neither is a sturdy theory. Piercing improve out besides, surprisingly floor piercings. A floor piercing is a piercing that would not pass by any cartilage, in basic terms dermis, the exterior at last grows the piercing out and you do not have from now on piercing. you could pass a 365 days with out intercourse and a few months of soreness for something that isn't final very long, i do no longer think of this is an wonderful theory.
2016-11-11 05:10:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i had a prince albert, and it got infected. they piercer said to wait 3 weeks before i used it, but i only waited a day. it hurt like hell and i took it out.
2007-11-11 15:52:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by joe 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
ow, ow ow! Neither thanks, lol! Surely the question should have been 'which is worse'.
2007-11-11 15:01:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
both are pretty interesting...... yet frightening.... lol
2007-11-11 15:00:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Another Hutch 3
·
0⤊
0⤋