Hi,
I noticed no one answered your question, and I thought it was pretty interesting. I think Cichilds are really neat fish. The only ones I have ever owned were Oscars. I was interested enough in your question to search for some answers. I know its kind of a "no-no" here to cut and paste from Wikipedia, but, this is what I found and thought I'd share with you:
Because of the introduced Nile perch (Lates niloticus) and water hyacinth, deforestation causing siltation of water, and overfishing, many species of Lake Victoria cichlids have been wiped out or drastically reduced in the wild. By around 1980, fisheries of the lake yielded only 1 percent cichlids from all the catch, a drastic decline from 80 percent in the earlier years.[43]
As many as three hundred species or about two-thirds of the endemic cichlids, especially the ones that feed in the open bottom of the lake, became endangered or extinct. Some surviving cichlids, however, have adapted to the new threats by becoming smaller or hybridising with other species.[43] Thankfully, the myriad of satellite lakes surrounding Lake Victoria have not been affected, and harbor an array of similar species.
So, to me it looks like there are a variety of contributing factors, including the usual problem of mankind introducing a non-native species.
2007-11-15 12:21:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by 2007_Shelby_GT500 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you could no longer settle for a concept because of the fact of one component to it... i think of God gave life an incredible means to be versatile to its atmosphere. survival of the fittest is obvious. are you able to instruct that the fish didnt have the gene with in for this variety of exchange. can this is proved that those cousins are no longer purely distinctively distinctive yet of an identical, like white rhino and black rhino. African elephant and the Asian elephant. how approximately all distinctive breeds of canines? they wont pass decrease back to what they initially have been because of the fact the dominance of the genes with in them are too reliable now. doesnt mean it become ever a distinctive animal. what regarding something of the theory, havent you ever checked into the fossil information, like the cambrian explosion. it completely contradicts how life began interior the international from evolution. and fairly sounds extra like an act of God. GARY F... the fossil information dont help it. era. Darwin even says in his e book, that if any complicated organism may be shown to to exist with out different successive average adjustments that his concept could ruin down. thats been shown in cellular biology and bio chemistry. in basic terms one function in a cellular is a complicated device with many areas. to think of there is not any technology against evolution is small minded and stereotypical. look into "a scientific Descent From Evolution" signed by making use of over 600 scientist around the international. even cosmology is showing there is extra then what's seen. parallel universes and multi dimensions that are unseen at the instant are theories. doesnt the hot concept of spontaneous evolution contradicts itself? its what they got here up with in explaining the cambrian explosion, the lack of fossil information help evolution and all the organisms and animals that defy evolution.
2016-11-11 04:48:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋