English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

hillarys health care is a scam, got an e-mail from a friend of a friend in canada, he pays out 55% of his salary to the govt. for their health care system. which he says is really only a health diagnosis system. if you get sick, they give you a drug, their is no finding out whats really wrong with you, and if you so have a problem, you may wait 2 years to get it taken care of. and in canada, they say obese people are just a drain on the system. and the drugies are given clean needles, so as not to spread any more disease, at you expense, or course, because your paying for it out of you 55% tax, and immigrants, they pay nothing, all is free to them, again at your expense. and if you break a leg and have to have a special kinda of splint, you have to pay, because its not covered, neither ar alot of diabetic supplies, and we want this woman in the white house. I think not. how many of you out there are worried about this, I know I don't want to have to pay 55% of my salary, GOD HELP US...

2007-11-11 11:54:24 · 9 answers · asked by poopsie 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

9 answers

Miss Bean and you said it BEST who wants the government running it. Hillery will make million of it and then try and take over the world, then the armines will gather.........

So know this she must not get in no way it would mean the end of the country and even the libs.

2007-11-11 16:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by R J 7 · 2 1

while any baby-kisser makes a thought intimately they run the possibility of having their artwork torn aside intimately, then misconstrued and misrepresented by employing the persons who oppose the assumption. regardless of if the common plan is powerful the dissenters can create a diversion by employing exagerating the end results of Article 5, Paragraph 3 interior the 2d Addendum. perhaps Senator Clinton isn't being particular as a results of fact she has desperate to assist the assumption of a public well being care gadget without stressful to create it in any particular photograph, in spite of the undeniable fact that it relatively is maximum in all probability as a results of fact she is conscious that the weasels at Fox could misread each and every thing she mentioned besides. in case you have chose to be responsive to what standard well being care is, ask a Canadian. Ask a Swede, a Brit, a German or maybe a Frenchman. All of those democratic international locations have controlled to construct their very own structures to tournament their very own desires, and we can do the comparable as quickly as the political will is mustered.

2016-10-16 04:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The U.S. is NOT Canada.

Hillary cannot draft a health care bill when she is President - Congress will do that - she will either sign it, send it back to Congress for more work or veto it. That would be her only involvement.

If you were at all familiar with the 2 or 3 that have been suggested, you would see there is no similarity between what we will eventually have - and Canada.

2007-11-11 16:33:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Hiliary don't know what she is talking about.
Out health system is fine just the way it is now.
Her health system is like when you go to a
doctor you stand in line for four hours and the
doctor gives you two aspirin and tells you to
come back tomorrow and stand in line again.

2007-11-11 14:12:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

For all those who think government run health care is a good idea I submit this: Have you seen how the government runs all of its other programs? After the way the ****** everything else up, do you really want them in charge of your family's health?

2007-11-11 13:57:28 · answer #5 · answered by missbeans 7 · 2 2

I'm not a fan of universal healthcare. Something does need to be done with our health costs, but not a universal system. We can't afford it.

Also then it becomes who is going to be a producing member of society(paying taxes) and who is not. And if you aren't you know where you'll be if you need critical care.

2007-11-11 12:03:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

dont know if i would want it. so much false info from both sides that none of it makes sense. seems kind of unrealistic that more than fifty percent of a persons paycheck goes to the govt just for health care. email from a friend of a friend, please dont stop your fact checking there.

2007-11-11 12:24:46 · answer #7 · answered by effrock 1 · 0 4

i agree
only the moocher will benefit

2007-11-11 12:03:14 · answer #8 · answered by Mary Jo W 6 · 2 2

who really cares

2007-11-11 12:15:44 · answer #9 · answered by speechy 6 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers