Publishers don't care about age. You get it published the same way adults get there books published. Look up how to get published. I think you have a write a quarry but I don't know what a quarry is! You might want to have people critique your book before you have a publisher read it.
2007-11-11 12:26:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
im 14 and i faced the same problem i wrote a book , and got it published . thru self-publishing that is. all you do is write your story in word upload it to their site. pick the size of book design the cover the backcover etc. and its officialy pulbished. you can sell it on there website . or yopu can buy an isbn for only $50 its cheap and get it distributed to amazon,barnes and noble school libarys the works . its great and the website is
lulu.com
2007-11-11 13:48:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by redsox 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, plenty of young people have had books published. But I think you're probably best concentrating on building up your talent by practice, rather than focusing too much on getting into print right now.
2007-11-11 11:42:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wulfstan O Malley 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
to respond to your question, definite, a new child can get revealed. The writing must be damned good (and somebody different than your dad has to think of so; Harvard or no, your dad has an obtrusive bias), with the aid of fact the age of the author isn't taken under consideration whilst the e book is examine. The publishers do not care. to respond to your question: a million. Publishers are searching for marketability. they're constantly thinking what is going to sell, and who they could sell it to. Smaller publishers specialise in particular genres and look especially for delusion or teen novels. i don't be attentive to the specifics--i'm an beginner author, even nonetheless my mom is a specialist nonfiction author--yet I even have the effect that publishers are rather skeptical, tremendously whilst it is composed of recent authors. Do each thing you are able to to make a physically powerful effect. 2. in case you positioned up "traditionally" (i.e., you do not self-positioned up your artwork), you will in all probability go with to get an agent. you will question brokers till one has a similar opinion to signify you. This frequently is composed of countless waiting and countless rejection. If an agent has a similar opinion to signify you, he/she would be waiting to not take any funds till the e book is offered to a writer. If the e book is offered to a writer, you will enter a settlement with the writer which will grant you an improve and a proportion royalty which you will make with each e book offered. Your agent gets a decrease of the salary besides in replace for promoting the e book. i don't be attentive to how lots, yet i might wager it is going to by no capacity be lots, tremendously in proportion to the quantity of artwork positioned into writing. in case you self-positioned up, you will pay to have the e book revealed, marketed, and carried by utilising different places (e.g. amazon). you will pocket a hundred% of the salary, yet you will ought to make back the money you positioned into the publishing. 3. the percentages of your e book being stolen are incredibly lots zip. it is so annoying to sell a singular that it is not nicely worth it to thieve one. If it takes you months to years publishing it, do you rather think of that somebody might bypass with the aid of all that hardship to make a tiny little bit of money? 4.the guy who says the element approximately Golden Compass is erroneous; Pullman is an grownup. i think they meant to assert Eragon, which develop into written by utilising a 15-twelve months-old boy. of course, he's the exception to the rule. i can not think of of a single different useful new child author.
2016-09-29 01:10:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol, i have the same prob, so if you ever find out, LEMME KNOW!!!! God bless.
2007-11-11 11:41:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mrs. Cullen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
same here
2007-11-11 12:27:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
same!
2007-11-11 11:47:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by <3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋