English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Impeached Clinton? Almost Impeached Nixon?

Why are there so few Two Term Presidents good enough to be elected twice and not be Impeached?

2007-11-11 11:06:49 · 16 answers · asked by DANCER 2 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

The most damaging president was Franklin Roosevelt. His "new deal" introduced us to socialism, one step at a time.
True, it took away the hangover of the unwise roaring twenties, but isn't that the selling point of communism, "everyone can be rich"?

2007-11-11 11:17:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Every president has contributed many positive things to this country. They all also had their failings. Members of Congress who operate the impeachment process, realize that they are very human and subject to many failings. Impeachment should reserved for rare occasions such as murder, grand theft, treason, or an attempt to overthrow the Constitution.

2007-11-11 19:21:51 · answer #2 · answered by Bibs 7 · 1 0

OKAY I'm going to explain this one time so here goes.
At some point a person usually a young person starts out to help in his country and gets involved in politics at the local level at this time they are usually inspired by patriotism and high ideals.
After awhile they move on up and learn to make deals to get what they want.
I'll vote for your issue if you'll vote for mine.
Then you know somebody leaves you a case of steaks to say thanks for a job well done.
and you move from state to federal office and usually still have some of those ideals but the erosion has started and will only become worse as time goes on.
Some love the perks and all love the POWER and they are both more addictive than crack.
By the time it comes to President it's mostly the crook that tells me he will follow my preferred course of action on the most important issues of the day.

You are correct I hold all politicians in very low esteem.

2007-11-11 19:26:30 · answer #3 · answered by CFB 5 · 0 0

Well I guess it depends on your opinion, I find our current president much worse then either of these men. And then there is Nixon, while an expert on forign policy a paranoid person. Carter may have been brought down by the Iran hostage situation but a fine Christian man, and Johnson by Vietnam but he did much to stop poverty and enhance civalrights.

2007-11-11 19:48:31 · answer #4 · answered by stashnut7 3 · 1 0

Clinton was NOT impeached it failed in congress if he had been impeached he would have been removed from office see Andrew Johnson to understand the process

Now back to your question Hoover and Bush 2 are the next 2 idiot presidents the nation saw fit to elect

2007-11-11 19:20:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Harding, Coolidge, Hoover,

2007-11-11 19:10:37 · answer #6 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 3 0

George H.W. Bush
Bill Clinton
George W. Bush

Basically, everyone since Regan. The problem is the last three presidents have all been liberal. Regardless of party affiliation, they have been communist in disguise.

2007-11-11 19:44:27 · answer #7 · answered by A Human Bean 4 · 1 0

Hoover was a joke and Clinton when he blew it, or I mean, Lied to the people about Monica.

Nixon was crucified cause he called the media a bunch of card carrying communists, which for the most part, is true. Our own media helped the North Vietnamese win by swaying public opinion and got many soldiers spit on and stuff thrown at them when they came home.

Look at the way they are covering the war now. Seems their hatred for Bush is so bad, they want nothing more than America to lose, again.


Semper Fi

2007-11-11 19:13:31 · answer #8 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 5 4

Coolidge, Harding, Nixon, Eisenhower, Reagan, Bush, Sr., Bush Jr., LBJ, Carter, and Ford.

2007-11-11 19:13:46 · answer #9 · answered by mollyflan 6 · 3 4

Lets talk about Bush

2007-11-11 19:39:42 · answer #10 · answered by jeffwey m 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers