Or did the Bush Administration already forfeit this card by playing it in error in Iraq?
2007-11-11 09:15:23 · 23 answers · asked by Bye for now... 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Edit: Fast Eddie, I think I agree with your timetable.
2007-11-11 09:39:34 · update #1
Edit: Jerry and Condor, I think you are right in your appraisal of the role Israel will play in the attack.
2007-11-11 09:55:40 · update #2
Edit: nil_8: I share your frustration.
2007-11-11 09:58:56 · update #3
Edit: Scubadog - if you want to compare basketballs to oranges then lets talk about N. Korea, who DOES have nukes, but who we are not going to attack. Can you walk me through that one?
2007-11-11 10:03:52 · update #4
Reason? I didn't know the Bush administration needed a reason for anything! He certainly didn't need voters.
2007-11-11 09:19:35 · answer #1 · answered by nil8_360 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
I am still confused about this no WMDs lie.
we found several dozen chemical weapons type artillery war heads.
How many people will each shell carrying SARIN kill at one time.
should I go into the 500 tons of yellow cake uranium that he did have.
I could be wrong so you tell me but I kind of figured nukes would definitely qualified as WMDs.
That all means HELL Yes he can use it again but I would change the term to NUKES.
2007-11-11 09:28:36 · answer #2 · answered by CFB 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Can and will; just a question as to whether the Israelis or the US is gonna hit 'em first.
I give it six months, one year - tops - and the three principal Iranian nuclear weapons sites will be taken out. This includes the Natanz nuclear enrichment site that's made out of six-foot thick concrete and steel walls and is buried under twenty feet of rock. Hope to see that one on tape!
No question about it - the Iranians wackameanajobs are literally begging for it and, as a result, they're gonna get what they hope for. They are certifiably crazy from the point of view of the West and will have to be re-educated as to what it means to be a member of the community of nations. We can definitely help 'em with that!
2007-11-11 09:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
i think the Bush Administration already forfeited this card by
going to war in error with iraq.
i think israel and america each want the other one to go
after iran. problem, israel is always condemned by the united
nations no matter what they do and america is strongly disliked in parts of the world due to the war in iraq. since irans
leader says israel needs to be wipedd off of the face of the
earth i,d love for israel to go after them. somebody needs to.
2007-11-11 09:25:16 · answer #4 · answered by Jerry S 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The wrestle in Iraq is carefully unjustified. i have tried to locate the authentic motives in the back of why we invaded Iraq yet i have stumbled on extra questions than solutions. i'm presently contained in the military, presently in Iraq and that i hate the actual shown reality that I absolutely ought to help this farse of a conflict in any skill. imagine lengthy and hard before you connect the protection force; do you want to be despatched to the different fringe of the planet to wrestle in a conflict it extremely is unjust? That has no deliver about sight? in case you connect, you're coming over right here.
2016-10-24 01:27:29 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Playing the devil's advocate: the US has nuclear weapons, why shouldn't any other country that wants them? Why not private citizens if they can afford it?
This time it's the French who are taking up the issue of Iran's nuclear weapons program. So the real question is: since they didn't support us in Iraq, should we support them in Iran?
2007-11-11 09:23:49 · answer #6 · answered by maxnull 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about we sell nukes to all the dozen or so countries in the middle east and give them all free marshmallows to go with them.
It would sure change the picture and we wouldn't have to war with anyone.
2007-11-11 11:33:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Bush and cronies will not find another way o start WW III they might use the good old WMD fairy tail again. But from what I read and believe that Israel will bomb Iran's nuclear facilities and we must defend our ally Israel.
2007-11-11 09:26:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Iran has a nuclear program. The World has said so including Amadinajad.
2007-11-11 09:27:24 · answer #9 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, but if you add Iran's support of terrorism (Hezbollah), their hostility towards us since the Iranian revolt, and their support of our enemies inside Iraq, a strong case can be made to attack them. We should destroy: their nuclear facilities, their Navy and Air Force, and their oil and natural gas pipelines. We won't need to send in ground forces, they will surrender to our Naval and Air attacks.
2007-11-11 09:35:01 · answer #10 · answered by Shane 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No because they don't have any, and wont by our estiment for at least 8 more years. Then what are they going to do with them?
The USSR had 1000's of WMD how many fights did we pick with them?
Iraq had nothing to do with WMD or 911..... But it sure fooled allot of people.
Watch this see if it seems familiar... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-eyuFBrWHs
2007-11-11 09:31:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋