English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do we teach kids that violence is not the answer and then have them read about wars in school that solved America's problems?

2007-11-11 07:14:24 · 15 answers · asked by calis_5nest 2 in Social Science Sociology

15 answers

We can never completely rule out violence because when all else fails, violence becomes the most effective way to get a point across. Sure I feel it should be the last resort but sometimes, especially in the defense of yourself or another from physical attack, violence in fact is the answer.

As far as America teaching the youth about wars...I think its important to show them what happened in history but of course also important to explain the cause and effect aspects of the war.

2007-11-11 12:22:03 · answer #1 · answered by daboah2003 1 · 1 0

My friend, you've only scratched the surface of one of the problems parents create for their children. I am a young adult, and here are some of my thoughts on the matter: Parents also let their children play violent video games, watch violent movies, play with action figures that have violent careers (army men and wrestlers), play with fake guns (some that shoot fake ammunition, others that shoot water), and use violent language all because parents nowadays are more interested in being their children's friend rather than being a parent.

Parents today (as a whole) are hypocritical jokes. They always tell their children not to do something or live a certain way, and then they surround their children with everything - including their own behavior - that reinforces the idea that it actually is alright to do those negative things and live that kind of negative life. For example, parents tell their children not ot lie, then they lie to them about the existence of Santa, the tooth fairy, and the Easter Bunny. If the child answer the phone and it is for the parent, the parent will tell the child, "Tell him I'm not here." Parents also, at least, tell their children not to have sex at a young age, but at the same time they let them watch teen drama tv shows that shows teenagers flirting and having sex amongst a whole slew of other things. Better yet, parents may even tell their children not to have premarital sex because it is morally and Biblically wrong, but once the child is around 15 or 16, parents will change the rule and say that they should wait to have sex with the one they love. Everyone knows that a teen's hormones are naturally raging and that "love" comes easy at that age, so the teen thinks it okay to have sex at the first sign of a crush. All this being said, it's funny how after child grows up to be miserable, the parents say they just don't understand how it happened. How stupid can parents be?

2007-11-11 14:35:15 · answer #2 · answered by peaceablefruit206 7 · 0 0

Dude, violence is the rule of nature! as a manner to proceed to exist, violence is needed, and every person who says that it rather is erroneous would not very own fabulous powers of remark for the international around us. human beings have this unsuitable theory of what violence capacity, that's why you have have been given countless wackos saying it rather is okay or it rather is an unforgivable sin, and so on. yet once you think of approximately it, the international might only be a void if there have been no violence to shape it, to style existence, to not point out to adapt and differentiate into thousands and thousands upon thousands and thousands of existence types. Violence is only the war to not in basic terms proceed to exist, yet to thrive; each action you're taking--from respiratory to strolling on the sea coast to manipulating supplies to create something else--is a sort of violence in which you're changing, the two coming up and destroying on a similar instantaneous, the encompassing count number. So, with this in techniques, violence only capacity substitute. consequently, it rather is not incorrect, it rather is organic. even nonetheless, it rather is a controversy on physics incredibly than on morals. you should come to a determination for your self no count number in the adventure that your strikes are morally incorrect or good. in my view, I have not any qualms with violence, yet that doesn't mean that i bypass around killing human beings or blowing issues up. it rather is a physically powerful question, yet regrettably, unanswerable!

2016-09-29 00:48:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I could see it as self-defense, but that is rarely what is happening when there is violence. I don't see the wars that the United States is involved in now are for good reasons. These are about power.

2007-11-11 07:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by Simmi 7 · 0 0

Because to restrain knowledge because some find it offensive does harm to the child, and to our future, and to their future.

If you tell a kid to not do drugs, but don't tell them why, then they'll go get some just to find out why....

Many things are not taught in school that I wish were.

Many things that are taught in school are so watered down to avoid offending somebdoy that the facts no longer have any real meaning behind them.

2007-11-11 07:30:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Have you ever combed out a child's long tangled wet hair? If you draw the comb down from the top, the tangles bunch up about halfway down and the comb gets stuck. The top part of the hair is sleek and untangled and well combed, but the bottom part has this mat of tangles. How we raise our children is like that. We comb out as many tangles for children and create a seperate "zone" of reality for them. But, we forget that they are part of the whole head of hair, so to say. When children enter adulthood and learn about that tangled zone of reality, their energies become focused just trying to navigate through all the tangles and all of our good intentions for creating an untangled zone for children becomes meaningless to them, and to society.

Most of our problems in society that we try to hide from children exist specifically BECAUSE we hide them from children, like that mat of tangles awaiting us when we launch into adulthood. If humans were forced to show and tell their children what we really are, we would behave less poorly as adults. Think about it. We have powerful natural urges not to harm or traumatize our children. But, by totally seperating childhood from adult realities, we have lost a significant inhibitor and govenor of behavior, that being our intense desire to protect children from danger. By seperating our children from adult reality, we are not conducting ourselves as honorably as we would with children more naturally incorporated into our social conscience.

2007-11-11 07:31:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if you tell kids that violence is not the answer, it will prevent wars in the future...
history is doomed to repeat itself if it is never taught...

2007-11-11 07:26:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

violence is never the answer! sadley, we all live in a world where violence is averywhere!0:)

2007-11-11 10:34:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Snark alert:

For the same reason we tell them not to get involved in drugs while we down the gin.

2007-11-11 07:26:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

in some cases you cant avoid violence

2007-11-11 07:17:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers