Giuliani, now exposed as an "Israel Firster," has been endorsed by Zionist wackjob tv preacher Pat Robertson. Plus he's also got an accused peodophile preist working on his consulting firm who is one of his best friends!
Hillary Clinton, another "Israel Firster," was caught planting fake reporters in her audience to lob her softball questions, just like BushFraud did with male prostitute and fake reporter Jeff Gannon. Clinton was also rumored to be at the Bilderburg conference this past year, but has deny that she was there. Should we believe her?
And these two clowns are the frontrunners?
Oh, and special mention goes to Fred Thompson for having a convicted drug felon on his staff!
You gotta love America!
2007-11-11 06:42:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The fact that these two will put Israel first is not anti-semitism. Get over it.
2007-11-11 07:06:27 · update #1
Their NWO puppet masters not as unified as the observer might think: there is obvious in-fighting, but a Bilderberg conference invite is usually an indication that you've been selected or 'crowned' - (e.g.Blair is known to have attended one before he was even leader of the UK Labour Party and within a coupe of years he was Prime Mi-sinister) .
it might be looking as though that Giuliani is being set up to fall and that is the course that is taking shape -albeit with some hampering by a pro- Giuliani faction within the power classes or a faction who may disagree with timing or tactics. - hence the confusion. in long run Bilderberger Hitlery must be seen to have the upper hand though.
2007-11-11 07:22:13 · answer #1 · answered by celvin 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if I had my determination, i could % Dodds. i like him, he's a upward thrust up guy , and that i think of he could have the ideal possibility at bringing jointly the two Reps and Dems. yet I dont have my determination, and it does suck. besides, i'm no longer vote casting for gulianni, watch this next 365 days, anyone is going to be surprised on the the flaws that come out approximately him. I cant beleive that he would not be attentive to that the final election will destroy him.
2016-11-11 03:56:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if I had my choice, I'd choose Dodds. I like him, he's a stand up guy , and I think he would have the best chance at bringing together both Reps and Dems. But I dont have my choice, and it does suck. Anyway, I am not voting for gulianni, watch this next year, people are going to be amazed at the the things that come out about him. I cant beleive that he doesn't know that the general election will ruin him.
2007-11-11 07:05:20 · answer #3 · answered by Robino 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
My opinion is that Hillary took the biggest hit because of the "illegal immigrant drivers license " fiasco. Giuliani at least got Pat Robertson's Endorsement and did a lot of radio and T.V. interviews where he made several valid statements...
2007-11-11 06:49:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
You are completely right,
I'm gonna have to say Hillary had the biggest hit this week though, Barack is getting pretty close to her.
I really am fighting for Obama to become our president.
His best interest is to IMPROVE America,and hes exactly what we need
Hillary is going to keep secrets from us,and lie constantly.
2007-11-11 07:59:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clinton clearly caught the rough end of this one for all of her indecisiveness and waffling. Also if you are so worried about not having something to talk about that you have to plant questions there are dark days ahead of you.
2007-11-11 08:12:39 · answer #6 · answered by Ronald B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The special interests groups that un the US need compromised individuals in the presidency to make sure their agendas get carried out.
2007-11-11 10:58:17 · answer #7 · answered by Soul Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the meantime, the most qualified candidate for President, Bill Richardson, continues to be overlooked by the corporate media and the (thereby) uninformed populace.
Oh, to answer your original question: Clinton took the bigger hit by her waffling on the "driver's licenses for illegal immigrants" issue.
2007-11-11 06:51:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I really hope neither of these two becomes our next president.
We need someone to step up and take these two on. This is the perfect time for an independent to run. Bill Bennet. Steve Forbes. Ross Perot. Elizabeth Dole. Ted Nugent.
Someone.
Please!
2007-11-11 06:57:44 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
hilary.she always takes the biggest hits because she is a woman,yet somehow she always uses the bad publicity to her favor.she can make any bad situation work to her advantage even with her clothes on.
2007-11-12 03:45:47 · answer #10 · answered by CHER 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋