Because she had no intelligent answer and she knew it. The fact that she says "Afghanistan is going swimmingly" and Osama Bin laden is irrelevant, shows she is out of touch with reality.
If the master mind behind a bank heist got away, but we caught the driver of the Car, would that be good enough? Could we just drop the prosecution on the actual master mind? Absolutely not, so it amazes me that The Republicans think that letting Osama get away is somehow alright.
2007-11-11 06:42:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Myles D 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
because of the fact she become shocked and disenchanted that Colmes' fill-in fairly had a backbone and wasn't going to take her evasive answer BS...the question become "are you saying that Bin weighted down is beside the point?" and because Coulter can no longer say particular because of the fact ought to contradict Bush's assertion that he would not think of roughly Bin weighted down, she reverted to the common "this is Clinton's fault" argument. inspite of what you think of roughly Clinton, what on earth does that could desire to do with the reality of at present? no longer something, and Coulter knew she become caught.
2016-11-11 03:55:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because she was surprised and upset that Colmes' fill-in actually had a spine and wasn't going to take her evasive answer BS...the question was "are you saying that Bin Laden is irrelevant?" and because Coulter can't say yes because that would contradict Bush's statement that he doesn't think about Bin Laden, she reverted to the standard "it's Clinton's fault" argument.
Regardless of what you think about Clinton, what on earth does that have to do with the reality of today? Nothing, and Coulter knew she was caught.
2007-11-11 06:56:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
What I find amazing is that this was on FAUX news. That other reporter got the best of Coulter, and I loved it!
I don't know what her name is, but she's my hero!
As ususal "Ann the Man" Coulter was ridiculous. Why do people even give her a forum or buy her books?
2007-11-11 07:00:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Coulter is whats wrong with America, if she is going to spew her hate and ridiculous arguments she had better be ready for someone to stand up and call her on it. She thinks Osama is irrelevant and Afghanistan is going swimmingly? Fantasy camp must be nice? Osama is responsible for al Queda, responsible for almost 4000 US civilian deaths and thousands of military deaths in Iraq and around the world.
2007-11-11 06:53:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Andy P 1
·
4⤊
1⤋
It is America. In most other countries she
would have to spend the rest of her rabid life
in a nutshouse or possibly even behind jail bars.
Coulter frequently attacks the NY Times and has claimed
that her "only regret" with Oklahoma City bomber McVeigh
is that he did not blow up "the New York Times building."
2007-11-11 06:50:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
This was added to youtube on 25 August 2006, over one year ago. Is there nothing more current, say the past six months?
Kirsten Powers and Michael Brown didn't shut up long enough to allow her yo answer. You and I would have probably got up and left if we were being interrupted by a pair of know-nothings like Kirsten and Michael. Just another example of "liberal free speech". You are free to speak when they say you may.
2007-11-11 06:59:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by taxidriver 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
That wasn't a tantrum. She was irritated that the other woman was fillibustering. Ann wants everyone to hear her and she was unhappy to listen without getting the chance to talk. She got passed over.
I don't really like those uncontrolled fights for air time. I would rather hear the opinions and don't like to to hear a bunch of people talking over each other.
2007-11-11 06:40:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by marleyfu 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Watched the clip. Coulter was not allowed to respond and left, hardly a tantrum. Usually when people ask a question they want a response, and are willing to listen to it. I guess that wasn't the agenda this time.
2007-11-11 06:38:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6
·
4⤊
4⤋
She didn't like being challenged on her saying "Osama is irrelevant".
Republicans can't defend letting Osama go free.
2007-11-11 06:42:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by . 5
·
5⤊
2⤋