This was yet another chop on her "credibility tree"......There`s more to come over the next few months.
2007-11-11 06:15:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
The big buzz on the Sunday morning shows. The consensus, in my opinion, was yes they all do it. Edwards blasted Bush for his orchestrated events. Others will chime in. They mentioned nearly every Town Hall meeting has a Global Warming question.... why she felt compelled to do it this way? Perhaps her last debate showed alittle too clearly the candidate can not speak on her own two feet very well.
On the down side it goes against Clinton as perceptions of her being under handed and using deception through out both Clinton's days in politics could hurt her. There were more than just the one approached and another person spoke out about declining the campaign offer. It's the baggage she carries so anything that smells phony is not good PR for them.
I believe you understand. If others would get it ... it's politics as usual. Change and experience all right. Thanks.
2007-11-11 06:27:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Frankly, I think that news is more Liberal "planting" to give the perception there isn't anything more serious to criticize Hillary about...
That news didn't get an eye-brow raise from me and it makes us look stupid to place much emphasis on it. Hillary's politics are worthy enough of criticism.
2007-11-11 06:20:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
It means she shouldn't have.. and she will lose respect for it... but you know, they all do it.. she is just the one who got caught so far. Look at Bush's news conferences for example.. it is decided way ahead of time.. who can ask questions and what they can ask.. and the fool still bungles what he is supposed to say.
Politics is a very dirty business.
2007-11-11 06:18:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
you're joking right? Like you don't really know that every politician in the world does this, including our President during his press conferences?
Is this a variation of the "when did you stop beating your wife?" question?
I see the NEW HILLARY LIE is that "she can't think on her feet".
As if Bush ever did--LOL!
2007-11-11 06:19:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It means that male politicians don't have a corner on the market of corruption and sound bite elections.
2007-11-11 06:18:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by maryjellerson 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Just trying to control the situation and make sure people ask her questions that she readily has an answer. I don't expect people to know EVERYTHING, but this, this was pretty pathetic on her part. Can you say "control freak?"
2007-11-11 06:19:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Doc 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think for many people it confirms what they already knew. She will do anything to get elected.
And even if she claimed she knew nothing about it, she is still ultimately responsible for what her staff does on her behalf. If she can't control the actions of her staff, can she be trusted to run a country?
2007-11-11 06:17:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
It shows her desperation for power and the fact that she will do anything to get it. This is not the kind of person who should run our country.
2007-11-11 06:20:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
She desperately needs to control our perception of her. It also implies she doesn't think well on her feet.
2007-11-11 06:15:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by amazin'g 7
·
3⤊
3⤋