How many of you older citizens think that young people find it incredulous that you impeach a ??

Question

.
president for lying under oath about a fling with a stupid 24 year old girl who admitted to Vanity Fair that she had had oral sex with with many many men?
Why are you so obsessed with Clinton?
Which is worse? a lie about a fling? (which many of you have done), or a lie that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives, unnecessarily.
Come on now. What is the REAL reason you obsess over Bill Clinton?
Or is it that you too have been guilty of indiscretions that you have lied about, and piling all the blame on Clinton elevates your cheating behinds to a level of acceptability within yourselves.

(Please answer these questions coming from a 24 year old educated female......)

Answer 1

Here's a hypothetical. I "accidently" discover my boss committing an "indescretion" with the UPS driver. And then post the information on a web site with the names of both parties as the search terms. Which would be the more dispicable action, the boss and UPS driver for having intimate relations or me for posting it on the internet?

Crooked questions don't deserve a straight answer. Some people just can't seem to "get" that a lot of us knew that Bill was (is?) a philandering rooster, know that he lied about his philandering, and still think he did a good job as president. At least he didn't create an expensive (at tax payers' expense) media circus to draw attention away from the REAL issues facing our nation.

Answer 2

Honey, you may be educated, but you haven't any idea of what honor and integrity mean. I have never had a "fling" so I don't have to cover up for my "cheating behind".
Bill Clinton lied under oath. That is, he swore to the veracity of his statements. Those statements were conscious lies. If he didn't want to admit to his indiscretions,he could have taken the 5th.
He chose to lie.
Knowing that what he was saying was a lie.
To compare the reaction of George Bush to misinformation, which came from reputable sources, to Clinton's deliberate lying is not the mark of an educated person, who would have a hard time comparing the two.
If you have an issue with what President Bush did, then have it. That is your right as an American.
I have a personal issue with lying under oath. I have an even greater issue with a man of the caliber of Bill Clinton, who thinks that it is OK to be dishonorable, and to lie under oath, and make a mockery of the integrity of our judicial system, leading our Country.
The woman or women involved are irrelevant. What their history was, is irrelevant.
This man represented the United States of America, and he did so, dishonorably.
Making an honest mistake, based on faulty information, is something that even the most honorable of us might do.
There is no comparison between the two.

Answer 3

well, sweetie, you may be 24, but you are not educated. it is illegal to lie under oath, and it was not to hide the fact that he was getting blown by the little fat whore, it was to obstruct the sexual harrassment lawsuit by paula jones. or maybe you think its ok for men to get away with sexual harassment? what lie cost hundreds of thousands of lives? are you referring to WMD's? well, if every intelligence agency in the world had told bush that there were no WMD's, and he went ahead and pretended that there were, that would be a lie, but we all know that is not what happened. infact, clinton was the first president to declare the existance of WMD's in iraq. america was attacked by muslims 11 times while clinton was president, and he did nothing about it. we haven't been attacked ONCE since 9/11, and that is because bush and his administration have taken care of business. the only thing bush has done wrong, is not having treasonous americans like pelosi, kennedy, and murtha shot

Answer 4

The Clinton case wasn't about a bj and if you were EDUCATED you would know that. Having said that, he lied under oath and regardless of whether one should be in the situation to be under oath in the first place is irrelevant. Though I have to be honest and say I would love to sit and have a beer with wild Bill, he is NOT a moral or honest man. Bill Clinton was too concerned with maintaining the status quo to take terrorism seriously- he learned this as Americans (including Bob Dole) went after him for the US involvement in Somalia. Unfortunately, Osama Bin Laden gave an interview in 1998 in which he stated that the lack of response to the attacks of the 90s and the hasty withdrawal from Somalia were a major factor in his realization that he could continue to attack the US at will and could infact defeat the US because it showed him that the American people lacked the will and resolve to fight. I know this upsets some people but the facts are the facts, Osama said this and getting made and defensive wont change that.

Answer 5

Completing the 6th grade is not necessarily being educated. Clinton was impeached for lying - on TV, no less.
Judging from some of the things in Ms. Willey's book, Target, he may soon find himself in court for more serious things that lying. Now that would be a first, a President doing time for sex crimes and obstruction of justice.

Answer 6

Read David Shippers book "Sold Out" He is the Liberal Chicago lawyer that represented the House Managers. They did not want to impeach for lying under oath. He documents in his book the felonies that they wanted to impeach Clinton and Gore for. They had a secure evidence room for the members of Congress to review the evidence against them. Only one member of Congress went and reviewed the evidence. That was Rep. Mary Bono. It was a done deal before it ever got to the Senate.

Answer 7

I don't believe that you are educated. If you were you would discuss more relevant facts regarding Clinton's behavior, such as national security and what his state department operatives were doing while he was getting a bl0w j0b.

Additionally there was plenty of evidence that radical islamic organizations were gearing up to attack the United States. How does sitting in the oval office sticking a cigar in a young female's vagina square with performing the duty you were elected to perform.

Oh there is the fact that he is married, thus demonstrating a fatal flaw in his character. If you can't wrap your mind around these issues and understand that it is beneath the dignity of the office of the president of the United States then you should get a refund for your education, or go back and pay attention, that is if you didn't major in basket weaving.

Answer 8

What a cynical question!
You mean 24 tr old dumpy twit(I'm talking about Monica), don't you.
Anyway, the public is well aware of the many devious and illegalities committed by the Clinton Attack Machine,
Ex: the new book out by Kathleen Willy?
Does George Foster ring a bell? alleged murder and disappearance of political opponents (look out Obama!!!)
Its just that Slick Willy WAS CAUGHT that one time with (forgive the pun) his pants down, and the Republicans took advantage of the opportuniy!

Answer 9

I find it interesting that the Republicans go after their own party members and remove them when they are even suspected of committing acts that bring to question their capability to lead society away from corruption and immorality.
The Democrats put their criminal party members (William Jefferson and Ted Kennedy for example) up on pedestals as exemplifying what the American Left is all about.
Nancy Pelosi, where are YOUR ethics? YOU swore to both set, and uphold ethical standards.

Answer 10

I don't obsess over Bill Clinton. I always felt that Bill Clinton lied about that because he didn't wish to so horribly embarrass Hillary and Chelsea. We have had presidents who have had flings before but nobody obsessed about them like they did over Bill Clinton. Every effort was made throughout his presidency to undermine him. That may have been due to the fact that he had a history of womanizing.

I hate the fact that he has that problem, but other than that, I thought he did an excellent job as president. Far better than Bush 41 or 43. I think the whole episode was the beginning of things to come. The lack of interest in what is good for America versus religious issues distorting the Constitution. It is a sign of the times.

I'm 60 and the contrast between what the U.S. was my whole life as compared to what it is now is astounding and very frightening. I worry for my grandchildren and feel sorry that they will never know what the U.S. stood for or realize the benefits of it.