why dont we impeach george bush?

Question

Bill Clinton got oral sex they try to impeach him ... George Bush lies to the american people and kills thousands of people and he does not get impeached ... i dont understand how americans could reelect him anyways ... oh yeah the high oil prices next he will say let me drill in Alaska and oil and gas prices will go down ... in my opinion he is a evil man

Answer 1

George W. Bush is a crime against humanity! At least Clinton answered questions, Bush refuses to answer to anything or anyone including the U.S. Constitution! He is for all purposes a dictator....starting unconstitutional wars and attacking sovereign nations that had absolutely nothing to do with 9-11! Saddam Hussein was just one of many bad leaders in the world! Iraq was no direct threat to the United States and had no weapons of mass destruction as Iraq honestly stated! Defending George W. Bush, is like defending Adolf Hitler! Both were wrong and the world needs to know Americans are not afraid to admit when they make mistakes electing foolish politicians, who commit foolish mistakes and innocent people, including our military pay a steep price in the duration for the governments inept policies under idiotic, false, stubborn leadership!

Answer 2

Article II Section 4 of the constitution states:The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

So tell me please what crimes he has committed? Just because you do not like his policies, does not warrant impeachment. Remember that Congress AUTHORIZED this war, and not by a small margin either. Perhaps you should think about that?

Bill Clinton DID COMMIT a crime. He LIED under oath to a Grand Jury. That is PERJURY, a FELONY. He was impeached, but not convicted because of PARTISAN POLITICS. There was NEVER ANY DOUBT about his GUILT. The reasons for his lying are moot. Whether it was for getting a ******** ( which is also a Felony called "SODOMY" ) or any other reason, lying under oath is still perjury..

You don't understand how America could re-elect him? Are you old enough to vote? DID YOU VOTE? and what choice did the Democratic Party give America in John the gigolo Kerry? A man who is so far to the left he made Ted Kennedy look like a conservative? Really, If you can't understand how that happened I truly feel sorry for you. Perhaps you should take them rose tinted glasses off and really SEE the world for what it is, a DANGEROUS place where the only people who "play fair" wind up being the LOSERS.

Answer 3

I like easy questions. The Democrats will never try to impeach Bush because they know that could only hurt their chances of winning in the future. As long as there are only two choices on election day, the people of this nation will never truly be represented in government. This is because the elected officials are always worried about the next election, not serving the people. Both parties are equally guilty. Look at the children's health care bill. Bush vetoed it, citing extensive earmark spending. His administration has doubled the national debt from somewhere around 4 trillion in 2000 to nearly 9 trillion now. Don't tell me the few extra billion in that bill actually bothered him. The Democrats don't really care if they can overcome his veto, they just want to be able to say he vetoed it so they can win over a few extra votes. Neither of the parties actually care about the kids. Yet, we still claim to be the best country in the world. Time to come up with some evidence of that assertion, folks.

Answer 4

i might want to work out them come abode besides. regrettably, i don't think of impeaching Bush is the acceptable answer for the rustic, lots as I dislike the guy. The Clinton impeachment hearings for (by utilising assessment) trivial "offenses" virtually tore the rustic in 2; an impeachment at this element could be lots greater unfavorable to the rustic in my opinon. Bush would be a lame duck president in under 18 months; i think of it rather is greater acceptable to easily leave the fool the place he's, and vote for somebody who could actual have the capacity to envision next time around.

Answer 5

Democrats are struggling to formulate a uniform response to wiretapping, but two things stand in their way. One: Wiretapping is popular. Americans want their enemies watched, be they confirmed or suspected, period. Two: Democrats are in a position to make substantive gains this November; the idea of impeachment before or after the midterm elections could hurt their chances. They are against wiretapping, but softly, sending only resident fools to mention impeachment (e.g., Boxer, Waters, Lewis, Dean), fearing that anything stronger will spoil a real electoral opportunity. Clinton’s boy-themed excesses set the Democratic party back 11 years and would have cost it a generation if not for newly minted Republican excesses.

Even Harry Reid knows what’s at stake. “I’m not a big fan of impeachment. I think it should come only when all other avenues have been exhausted and that certainly hasn’t been the case here …. I think we’re way above the radar screen. I think impeachment this time is not something we need to talk about. I think we need to talk about the other failures of government and I don’t think we need to go rushing off to the ‘I’ word.” He may not have a grip on the real world, but Senator Reid understands politics.

Democrats are struck by the notion of passivity being to their benefit, but have too much to lose. They don’t have the guts to impeach Bush – now or ever.

Answer 6

I think I have a different answer that does not involve bashing somebody, well it probably bashes everybody but whatever. if congress tried to Impeach Bush something "bad" will happen. Spotlight will go from the congressmen to Bush, with the election next year they do not want this to happen. Also if they tried to Impeach Bush, the spotlight will go to Republicans who will get a lot more airtime. So trying to impeach Bush would be bad for their publicity, and chances at office. Finally, he only has a year left, so its not like it would make that much of a difference.

Answer 7

In order to be impeached he must have commited something illegal. He kills thousands of people, eh? GEORGE BUSH KILLS THEM??? We're in a war, buddy. People die in war. I greatly thank them for their service, they were heroes! But here's what I'm getting at - under a leader like Bill Clinton, or Hillary, millions of babies would die each year...

And don't you know, BILL CLINTON WAS IMPEACHED! He just wasn't removed from office. Impeached isn't the same as removed from office. He went on trial, but they didn't find him guilty.

Answer 8

The impeachment (and disbarrment and loss of law license in his home state of Arkansas) was not about sex per se. It was due to his lying, under oath, in court. That's a felony!

You don't like high oil prices. Okay, what would you do to bring them down? BTW, historically, in the search for new oil the year to year drilling success rate has been from 1-in-9 to 1-in-11 wells find oil, or find enough to make it profitable to produce.

Answer 9

Wrong... Bill Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury... he was impeached for that... *NOT* for having oral sex... George Bush has *NOT* lied and *HAS NOT* killed anyone... *IF* you *EVER* come up with *REAL* charges... try again... and you might want to learn some facts rather than wishful thinking.

Answer 10

It is hard to catch him in a lie!For one thing he wouldn't testify publicly so he wouldn't be sworn in!Why do you think he would only "meet" with the 911 commission behind closed doors?Also it is easy to classify anything that might make you look like a liar as a national security secret!

Answer 11

This question comes up over...and over...and over...
The answer's the same: Because he has not committed an impeachable offense!
Clinton was NOT impeached over oral sex. He LIED under oath.
Oil prices would come down is we could access our own vast reserves. Don't like high prices? Blame Congress and the environmental lobbyists.