Would u vot for a Woman President? I would there may be less war.
2007-11-11 02:44:13 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes, I would but not the one running now, she's got too may views I disagree with, and a huge lack of respect for our military.
2007-11-11 03:08:40 · answer #1 · answered by Richard 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Being a woman does not guarantee the Chief Executive would be any less likely to get us into war than otherwise. When Maggie Thatcher led England, they had a nasty little war with Argentina. When Golda Mier led Israel, there were a number of ugly military confrontations with Israel's neighbors. When Indira Ghandi led India, there were serious armed conflicts. What makes you think a woman as President of the United States would lessen our risks of war?
2007-11-11 02:55:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes of course i would vote for a woman for president.
But i disagree about there being less war..When Golda Meir was prime minister Israel was at war, when Margaret Thatcher, was prime minister England went to war against Argentina...It all depends on what's going on in the world.
2007-11-11 03:29:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I wouldn't... Women are intelligent, and assertive people but I just believe that men should continue to run the country. Sorry. but I'm a big believer of patriarchy. Religious reasons... I will be voting for a man like I always have.... Unless they're all extremely crooked then I would have to contradict myself.
2007-11-12 03:45:02 · answer #4 · answered by Shan2k 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for a woman who shared my beliefs on key issues. The person's gender has nothing to do with whether we'd get into a way or not.
2007-11-11 03:47:09 · answer #5 · answered by Tommy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd vote for a QUALIFIED woman in a hot second. (And before anyone jumps on me - Hillary hasn't run so much as a bake sale - and some want her to be in charge of the free world? ARE YOU KIDDING?)
2007-11-11 03:31:21 · answer #6 · answered by zippythejessi 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"Never again allow a woman to hold the supreme power in the State..."
--Empress Cixi's final words
Why don't you learn some history before showing us how uneducated you really are:
Cleopatra http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra_VII_of_Egypt
Elizabeth I http://www.elizabethi.org/
Catherine the Great http://members.tripod.com/~Nevermore/CGREAT.HTM
Queen Isabella http://www.ctspanish.com/legends/isabella1.htm
Women can be just as ruthless as men. Your Madame Hillary will never be president. she is a communist and a socialist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
2007-11-11 03:01:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I could, but definitely not for the one that's running now.
And there's no guarantee that putting a woman in the White House would mean less war. Seems that Mrs. Thatcher is a prime example of that.
2007-11-11 02:52:12 · answer #8 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I would consider voting for a female president......but not this time . As far as there being less wars...that's debatable.
2007-11-11 02:53:03 · answer #9 · answered by Veritas 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for a woman for President. I would not vote for Hillary.
2007-11-11 02:52:22 · answer #10 · answered by Robert J 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋