She was in Iowa yesterday and her handlers were caught giving out lists of questions that audience members SHOULD ask! What a scam! Does anyone really want a President that will dictate what can or can't be asked of them???
2007-11-11 02:25:54 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This morning on an L.A. news station they reported a minister said he was approached and was given a question to ask. He refused. If she's elected his church will most likely lose their tax exemption. It happened to churches that spoke out against Bill when he was President. The Clinton's used the IRS to go after those that they perceived as enemies. The other candidates work to get their message out. Hillery and her staff have to work to keep things from coming out. In the debates she said it was not her choice to release her records from the Clinton Library. KFI Radio in Los Angeles reminded us last week that Bill Clinton made Bruce Lindsey and Hillery in charge of what gets released from the archives. Again she lied.
2007-11-11 03:13:10 · answer #1 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not a scam at all. When I ran for our state senate here in Arizona I did the same thing. I wanted people to know how I felt on a certain subject....in my case it was the advantages of building a wall on our southern border, particularly our Sonora Desert area. All questions were written and they were pulled from a hat in no particular order. I was certain that someone would have asked that particular question but I wanted to make sure. As it turned out three other people asked the same question. Oddly, my opponent did the same thing, so I suspect this is SOP in political campaigns. FOX and the right wing radio chumps have made a big deal out of this, but let's be real....if Sen. Clinton breaths in and out they view with alarm. Anyway...what was the particular question that these guys are crabbin' about? Does anyone know?
2007-11-11 02:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by Noah H 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think that if she keeps making mistakes during debates it will catch up to her. And to the person that says "everyone does it" let me say this: If everyone does it, where were the handlers for Obama?? I went to a debate in 2000 and I saw no handlers for any of the politicians handing out anything other that buttons, stickers, etc. What we have here is the Clinton War machine working on all cylinders.
2007-11-11 02:35:29 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
I sure hope something derails her from the primary.
I realize that's wishful thinking because I am sure as a political campaigner she can probably beat all the other Dem's all at the same time.
I am Conservative and I know she will be hard to beat.
hopefully between illegal contributions, planted questions, a total lack of morals combined with past illegalities will derail her.
2007-11-11 02:41:36 · answer #4 · answered by CFB 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It's not so much that she refuses, but rather, that she has no platform on which to stand -- unless you call blasting Bush and his policies a platform. Think about it, the dem.s are all mimicking the FDR campaigne, lots of socialist proposals and rhetoric about banning Bush to Texas. OK, so you ban Bush and you bring forth a bunch "Social" programs. Taxes are already more than high enough. How and who will pay for these new programs? I see a huge revolt on the horizon. It all just seems very myopic. But then, that's what she and all of the dem.s are noted for. Being myopic.
2007-11-11 02:40:23 · answer #5 · answered by Doc 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
at the instant, in fact to be prevented like the plague in maximum politicians' minds. fact could make the folk loose, and maximum politicians want them sure. by utilising evading the no longer ordinary questions, politicians can then distract the folk by utilising attacking people who've demanding concepts and talk to them. yet you will get a fantastically good theory in the unguarded moments, and by utilising examining the record of supporters, the place a infant-kisser's strategies is, and how the government would be run if that baby-kisser is in workplace. She is clever. as long as she could no longer rather answer, individuals will vote for her on peripheral products, and then after she would be in a position to spring the surprises, while that's merely too previous because of retract your vote!! that's maximum unlucky that balloting human beings look to love people who promise a lot in imprecise words over people who say it is going to take paintings yet we are able to straighten this mess out. And right this is how. Churchill had no longer something to furnish yet blood, sweat, and tears, yet he gained the war, with a splash help from his acquaintances, and saved the international from domination by utilising a monster. yet in maximum circumstances, at the instant the extra a infant-kisser can promise in imprecise words that sound good, and the less authentic dedication the new child-kisser makes, the extra probably they are to prevail in getting elected. unlucky yet authentic. Hillary might do nicely because of the fact all and sundry is guessing she would be in a position to do it their way, and don't dig to work out the place she nicely-knownshows her help so will do it their way as a replace! in spite of what she says to garner votes. and that i'm inspired by utilising her allusions to Democracy, because of the fact our government could ought to fall from its constitutional place that made us super to bypass right into a democracy...if one rather tests. That Hillary seems to need this makes me worry if she have been to be President. She might or would possibly no longer fail in her objective, even though it can be a poor fall for the u . s . a .!!. such a lot of electorate are knowledgeable in non-thinking kinds in our Public faculties that she gets by utilising with loaded words, and maximum will now no longer be conscious. i think of she is a lot smarter and infinitely extra crafty, than her warring parties even evaluate a danger. so as that they are probably to fail. And the stakes are extraordinarily important for the u . s . a . long term. anybody examine Orwell's "1984" anymore??
2016-10-02 02:39:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not a single question that could be categorized as 'tough' has been presented to fraulein Hillary
2007-11-11 02:41:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton's Motto:
When you come to a fork in the road, take it.....
Yogi Bera
2007-11-11 02:30:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
No it wont eliminate her but it will cause some people to take a closer look at the other candidates.
2007-11-11 02:46:10 · answer #9 · answered by hdean45 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not completely. She has enough blind partisan supporters that will continue to follow her just because of her label of democrat, not because of her agendas. It happened during her husband's administration as well.
2007-11-11 02:32:51 · answer #10 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋