If there is no military solution in Iraq Bush's strategy is a failure, why stay losing more precious lives?

Answer 1

there never was an effective strategy in Iraq thats what the generals told Bush in the beginning and thats why he fired those generals,his own father didn't go into Iraq the first time because he knew there was no east exit once we got there,its much like reason we that we didn't go into japan there is no way to win and we cant get out!!!its easy to lose lives in Iraq because its not Bush's life that is in danger.whether we like it or not we cant just pack up and leave now,it would make the region more unstable than it is right now.we have to somehow clean up the mess that George Bush has made,i say we send every person who supports the war,with Bush as their commander over there to fight and see if they support the war then

Answer 2

The fact of the matter is this. We are in the war in Iraq for oil. The only remaining question is this, are we there to protect the oil for ourselves, or for the entire world? Nothing on the planet moves without oil, but most importantly, no military can function without it. The world has been obsessed with oil ever since Winston Churchill, as secretary of the Navy, made the decision that Great Britain would have an oil powered Navy. That should all be obvious to everyone, even ostrich-person.

Another reason I believe we will stay is simple, you break it, you buy it. We destroyed the Iraqi infrastructure. Wanna know why? Because the military-industrial complex in America has been gathering up all the "rebuilding" contracts for the last decade or so. I wish I had a product line I could bring to market like they do. Lets convince all the politicians to buy our "precision munitions" so they can destroy everything our enemy needs to survive on its own. Now, lets convince them to pay us to go in and rebuild everything they destroyed with our bombs which weren't nearly as accurate as we said they were. But, how can we ever pull that off. They'd have to be crazy to go for that. Not crazy, just spineless. There isn't a politician in the world who wouldn't prefer to vote for more "private contractors" than institute another draft. Guess what helped to topple the Roman Empire? Outsourcing of military jobs that the military should be able to do on its own. Such as cooking, laundry, and rebuilding infrastructure. The Army can do it cheaper, too. And, they can protect themselves. I won't even talk about whether it was a good idea to senselessly destroy the infrastructure in the first place.

The final reason we are and will always be in the Middle East: that's the way the powers that be want it, and we don't get any say in the matter. They never had an exit strategy because they never had any plans to leave. It is true that the bulk of the remaining oil in the world is in the Middle East. Now think about everything that is based on oil. Look beyond your giant SUV's. How about plastics? 40% of the oil imported into the U.S. every year is used to make new plastics. Look at the food on your plate. If it has chemical fertilizers on it, which it does unless you grew it yourself or you paid out the wazoo for it, then it needs oil to grow. All our fertilizers, which are the miracle of modern agriculture, are mostly derived from petrochemicals. Without oil, our little blue green ball of a planet can only support about 1.5 to 2 billion of us. Who gets to pick? Probably the country with enough oil to run its bombers and tanks.

Now for the scary part. Some experts believe we only have 20 to 50 years of oil left. The only possible replacement for oil as energy is hydrogen fuel cell technology which is at least 40 years from being viable. If that is true, then that is certainly why we are in Iraq, and why we are there to stay.

Answer 3

War is always risky, but once we took over in Iraq, the responsibility for rebuilding the country was largely a U.S. responsibility. The situation right now is not a matter of military vs. military. It is an insurgency of civilians illegally (according to the Law of Armed Conflict and other international laws) fighting to gain their own control of the country. If this fact was included as an item in the initial planning stages of the war, then the mistake was to not let the American people know what we were in for. I don't know if it would have been appropriate to include the American public, because the planners couldn't have known for sure whether there would even be an insurgency. Lots and lots of things had to be weighed, and I doubt if this was an off-the-cuff decision.

Due to the world situation at the time, I believe we made the right decision to invade Iraq as being in our national interest. We are still in the "cleanup" stage, and it's protracted. The insurgents do not have control of the country, but withdrawal would spark consequences on the world stage that would put our country in an even more difficult position. Bush is doing the right thing.

Answer 4

If you want to start withdrawing troops who occupy foreign nations start with Cuba and the Philippines. Then do Germany and Japan, South Korea and eventually Iraq.

There is never a military solution and anyone who believes that there is should be imprisoned.

Military action si designed to do one thing and one thing only, restrict the political options of the opponent.

To make it simple, a military is similar to a person having a gun. When you point a gun at someone you give them a choice, do or die. The choice is made by a person, the gun is only a tool used to restrict options.

In the case of Iraq the United States removed the dictator and by maintaining a military presence in Iraq we restrict political options to a range of democratic choices that did not exist prior to the war.

There is never a military victory, there is always a political victory.

The military wins battles and wars, real victory is always political.

People are the only game in town.

Answer 5

Because if you would ever listen to what has been said by Bush since before this war began it requires a stable government that can defend it's self.

There now you've heard it again multiple factors have to be brought together and they are working on it.

Do you people have some special negativity pills you take every day.

Answer 6

Because we can still prevent a disaster in Iraq from spreading into a disaster for the entire Middle East (although that seems to be a shrinking possibility if you look at problems with Turkey and Pakistan).

Answer 7

If "Staying The route" turned right into a attractiveness for a Bush technique, then it turned right into a failure. a sparkling technique is necessary and quickly. i changed into questioning, possibly u . s . ought to vocally call for help from its Muslim allies. the challenge demands manpower that ought to keep the civil ailment in verify. Manpower that couldn't such an beautiful target for jihadic snipers and bombers, noticeably in the journey that they could't tell if a particular Muslim soldier is Shiite or Sunni. what form of jihadic hero ought to go back to his u . s .-of-foundation bragging of 21 kills -- 7 crosses/stars and 15 crescents!? If the U. S. asks its Muslim allies quietly for help, they're going to get quietly grew to change into down, because, frankly, the U. S. has no authentic Muslim allies. all of them probable ought to like the U. S. to lose face and run with its tail between its legs even if it skill yet another 1/2-a-million of their fellow Muslims perish contained in the resultant capacity war. possibly it will be the UN who ought to do the calling. If no longer possibly the U. S. can open its embassies in Muslim international locations to recruits prepared to wrestle "the finished hatred interior Islam," keep Muslim lives in Iraq, supply pressure to the voice of Muslim moderation, now to not teach benefit US citizenship and a beneficiant money bonus for his or her households. they favor no longer be educated to be squaddies, basically policemen and safe practices guards. possibly those adult adult males may even fly a sparkling flag it extremely is a blend of the Islamic crescent and the UN image.

Answer 8

Bush has left our war stagnant. It makes no sense to have more lives be lost without purpose beyond occupation.

Answer 9

Its not a failure. Stop listening to the tabloids. They are treasonists like CNN and the NYT.

Answer 10

Staying there is not helping us in any way. But how do we get out now without killing more soldiers?? The war on terrrorists WAS in Afganistan.