Such as stating the name of Ron Paul, not just Rudy, Mitt. They do not list them all. Such as calling cell phones, not just older voters on lan lines. There are so many flaws.
2007-11-11 00:38:38 · 8 answers · asked by needliberty 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
as the polls are not conducted by the gov. and not regulated
they really have no bearing in an election and are simply used to judge voter sentiment (at least that is the theory)
in truth the polls are designed to give the answer that those who are asking want and then the polls are used to influence public opinion, not judge it
so ron paul can lose all the polls and that is fine with me
as long as he wins the election
ron paul is the last hope for a free america
2007-11-11 00:58:49 · answer #1 · answered by 1 free American 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The polling method should be changed to include the full name of all people on the poll. I think we should make it a law that everyone in America eligible to vote has to vote. I say this because right now most normal people do not vote, and only the extremists from either side vote. This is why the country is so screwed up.
2007-11-11 08:44:55 · answer #2 · answered by Robert B 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If the system is flawed, and you can prove it, then why only investigate if Paul wins. Shouldn't we investigate before the primaries. It seems people are afraid he may actually win.
2007-11-11 11:49:04 · answer #3 · answered by benni 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It is true that there are flaws, but remember, it is better for the media ( which is predominantly liberal) to downplay the support of a candidate with a fresh outlook on the republican ticket because this can lead to less support for that candidate. This can nip the candidate at the bud so they don't become a threat.
2007-11-11 08:42:34 · answer #4 · answered by Professor Sheed 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Conspiracy is the last resort of desperate supporters of failing candidates. Ron Paul is always listed. Every poll that's been taken has him registering between 1-4%. If they didn't list him, they would have to list him at 0%.
Or is it all fraud! That's it! All these polling companies have gotten together to defraud one of the political candidates for no other reason than to just mess with him? Sorry I lost touch with reality for a moment.
2007-11-11 09:37:04 · answer #5 · answered by Dan 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
If they didn't investigate in depth W's two elections, why should they do that for an honest candidate?
We need someone like him in the White House. He's the only one who respects the U.S. Constitution and wants to do away with lobbying and throwing away money on useless departments like "Homeland Security", who exists for no real purpose.
2007-11-11 09:04:38 · answer #6 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It is a corrupt system created by corrupt politicians. If another corrupt politician exploits it for his benefit, then he should reap the reward.
2007-11-11 08:42:21 · answer #7 · answered by Christmas Light Guy 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Voting is for Geezers...that's what I've been hearing.
2007-11-11 09:28:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋