2007-11-11 00:20:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
KOAL: For those here who don't know, Koal is a debunking stalker of mine. Koal, I don't know what Hillarycare is. I don't follow that aspect of liberalism. But thank you for your prejudgment. (Koal happens to be a right wing zealot who hates liberals. I call those kind 'Limbaugh Lemmings')
2007-11-11 00:31:17 · update #1
DOG: You. That's who!
2007-11-11 00:33:00 · update #2
Yes. No constraints or parameters. Just whatever you think about the two.
2007-11-11 00:36:44 · update #3
How about EVERYBODY'S health and safety?
2007-11-11 00:24:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
apples and oranges here. the two have nothing in common and no relation to each other. if, by some odd chance, your referring to hillarycare 2, people making 80 thou a year are perfectly capable of taking care of themselves and dont need a handout. again, apples and oranges.
2007-11-11 08:27:08 · answer #2 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Are we talking about universal health care for the average person, rich politicians and insurance companies
2007-11-11 08:30:22 · answer #3 · answered by RELAX 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The two have nothing to do with each other. Unless you are referring to socialized medicine funded by the rich. Forget it, it's a dead issue.
2007-11-11 08:25:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
poor people health and safety
2007-11-11 08:23:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
poor people's health and safty.
2007-11-11 08:44:03 · answer #6 · answered by raj 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
healthy n safety.
2007-11-11 08:23:12 · answer #7 · answered by moonrider 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
more important to who?
2007-11-11 08:26:24 · answer #8 · answered by Dogmatic86 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋