English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

By tieing Palistine to Iran and garunteeing that Iran will not have the capability of achieving nuclear capacity will this force Israel into accepting a Palestinian state? If Bush pulls back and allows a nuke in Iran this would be detrimental to the security of Israel.

A tempting legacy wouldn't you say?

2007-11-11 00:18:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

bushwarcriminal-Israel was desert land not claimed by anyone but shared amongst many including a large portion of Jews. When ALL surrounding countries attacked Israel kicked there butts and pushed them back claiming even more land. Hence th Gaza Strip contoversy and others. Take a history class...it'll do you some good.

2007-11-11 00:31:07 · update #1

12 answers

The Israeli's have been ready to accept a Palestinian State for decades,but it has to be a Palestinian State that isn't constantly lobbing rockets at them. The only reason this issue wasn't solved decades ago,is because the Palestinians do not want peace.

YTP

2007-11-11 01:14:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Guaranteeing that Iran will not have nuclear capabilities?

How is the USA supposed to achieve that? If they could guarantee that, they would do it on their own since the USA regards a nuclear Iran as a severe threat regardless of Israel. And if in fact, the USA could guarantee that, then why couldn't Israel take the same course of action instead of relying on the USA to do it?

And if Israel was forced to accept a Palestinian state what would its nature be? Likely it would be hostile to Israel and perhaps pose an even greater threat to Israel than Iran should things deteriorate.

Yes, if Bush did that, he's have a legacy indeed... a not very flattering one, I would say.

2007-11-11 06:36:59 · answer #2 · answered by BMCR 7 · 0 0

No... In the first place Iran has absolutely *NOTHING* to do with Palestine and Israel land disputes... other than originating and funding and continued support for Hamass.
Secondly a Nuclear Iran would be detrimental to the entire planet... why would one punish just Israel to try and solve that problem
Third... Iran will *NEVER* give up it's Nuclear program on it's own... anyone that thinks that it will is an idiot and hasn't a clue as to what is going on in the *real* world.
Finely... Most of the "solutions" that I've seen closely resemble Hitlers "Final Solution" and are posed by Anti Semites. Many of which also hate the US because of it's support of Israel.

2007-11-11 00:43:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I don't think Israel would ever bow to our demands. First of all, I think it will more than likely be Israel that ends Irans nuke program wether the US likes it or not. They know they would be Iran's testing grounds for any weapon. I also think the next time a gulf country attacks Israel, Israel's citizens will be setting up condos on the water when the dust settles.

2007-11-11 10:05:17 · answer #4 · answered by Wine and Window Guy 4 · 1 0

Dude maybe u needa take a history lesson.
Check the map b4 1948 , was there palestine? yes. Now is there palestine?No

Palestine consisted of Arabs(christian,Muslim and jews) and they lived peacefully till 1948, thats when palestine accepted holocust survivors.After they came in, the radical jews(Zionists) created zionist regime and all the jews all ovver tha world started pouring in.They insistet they want to be independent but palestine refused to give their land.
Thats when the zionists forcefully declared independence and forced anybody no isnt jew(muslims and christians) out.

It is a illegal nation as what Bush=warcriminal said and why should palestine recognise israel when Israel is a part of palestine? Neo cons are doing a good job covering up for the zionists.
BTW i went to NYU and have a masters so u dont need to teach me no history and neo cons should finish their elementary school to begin with

2007-11-11 01:45:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Russel's answer above is nonsensical. i don't have time to rebut each and every factor yet i will commence with the 1st: "by employing the UN Partition plan,the Jewish State replaced into to be made out of approximately 5,500 sq. miles and the inhabitants replaced into to be 538,000 Jews and 397,000 Arabs. The Arab State replaced into to be 4,500 sq. miles with a inhabitants of 804,000 Arabs and 10,000 Jews." yet what do you think of a Jewish or Arab state ability? of course the Jews could migrate into the Jewish state and vice versa. At superb this could be passive yet, understanding the historic past of the middle East, there could in all probability be stress emigrate. ----- Edit: and that i desire that Russel is basically misinformed re decision 194 and not intentionally mendacity. decision 194 replaced into especially formulated in accordance with the Arab/Israeli conflict, case in point Articles 8 & 9 talk the plan for Jerusalem.

2016-10-16 02:56:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, given Israel's (confused and suicidal) current leadership.

Though, why Bush wants to give Jewish land to these people who danced in the streets on 9-11, who knows:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrM0dAFsZ8k

2007-11-11 12:40:39 · answer #7 · answered by mo mosh 6 · 0 0

yes but he wont, the pro Israeli lobby is to strong.

iran has no nukes anyway, they are even accepting UN inspectors something Israeli wont do.

some history
the state of Israel didn't exist until after WW2 when a Jewish homeland was established by the UN because of the horrors that the world allowed to happen in Germany along with Israel a Palestinian state was also established so by not recognizing the Palestinian, Israel is effectively voiding its existence.

2007-11-11 00:37:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Oh, yes, I'm sure Bush would support the creation of still another rabid anti-semetic state dedicated to wiping Israel off the map and encouraging it's children to wrap themselves in explosives in order to get a financial reward from the mullahs. That will happen at the same time Brittney Spears enters a convent.

2007-11-11 00:34:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

israel is another FAKE nation just like yugoslavia
And iran didnt say they would want to nuke or even atk israel for the matter.
No nation in the world have been created the way israel have been.It is a complete illegal state.

And oh yeah Bush backs up that Illegal nation so what can i say?

2007-11-11 00:25:45 · answer #10 · answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5 · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers