Should schools limit students' free speech? Why or why not?

Question

Please explain.

Answer 1

Yes and no.

On the one hand, students don't surrender their Constitutional rights as soon as they walk in the door. Its wrong for a school to censor the speech of students simply because it is controversial. Example: telling students they aren't allowed to recite the pledge of allegiance just because the word "God" is in it. The constitution doesn't say "freedom of speech except when controversial" or "freedom of speech except when someone gets offended." Indeed, it would be hard to imagine the founding fathers intended it to be this way also.

You have to remember, some of the biggest civil rights victories were won because groups of people exercised their free speech rights by speaking out against injustice even when it was controversial and even when people got offended at what they had to say (E.g.: Susan B. Anthony speaking out and organizing to secure women the right to vote). Thus, it is EXTREMELY important that free speech rights are protected.

On the other hand, no civil right is 100 percent absolute without limits or guidelines. For example, we've decided as a country that threating to kill someone, or shout "fire" in a theatre when there is no fire, is illegal because there is virtually no benefit to allow people to say these things, and the risk of saying them (conspiring to commit murder and causing a deadly stampede of panic) is enormous. Thus, schools are justified in restricting similar speech such as this, because it serves no purpose, is purely malicious, and is not conducive to a learning environment.

Obviously, its a very tough balance to achieve but it is absolutely essential to achieve.

Answer 2

There has to be a limit on speech--ideally, students should be able to limit their own, but some may have a "let's see how much we can get away with" philosophy, which means that someone else has to watch over them.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled, years ago, that the right of free speech does not extend to yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre--so, why say something that will hurt someone else, just because you have the freedom to do so?

Answer 3

purely to a undeniable quantity. Offensive and vulgar language has no place in a college. Telling a instructor or yet another pupil to "F*** off" isn't proper in any college placing! inspite of the undeniable fact that, scholars must be loose to voice political or non secular ideals, as long as they do no longer seem to be degrading others. the wonderful to loose speech isn't an absolute. Hate speech, racial slurs, etc. must be prohibited in any studying atmosphere. or maybe adults have not got finished freedom of speech; somebody may be sued for saying fake issues approximately somebody else.

Answer 4

Limits on free speech trains them to learn brevity ,to be concise/brief and proportionate emphasis on main points in their order of importance .It's basically a matter of training /learning than a matter of human rights.Any body can blabber about innuendos for hours without making /talking any sense(like politicians) but it needs hard training and practice to convey maximum with minimum words and in allotted time frame.