Yes, very strange. Weren't they supposed to be whooshed up to heaven? They must have been quite a sight, having been dead for who knows how long. They must have taken all the townspeople with them too, since there is not a single mention of these walking dead men in historical accounts from the period.
2007-11-10 15:30:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by bandycat5 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
You would think something as marvelous as that would have been better documented.
Is it really that difficult for an author to claim something like that happened 100 years earlier? Who could refute it if it was written much later than the purported events?
Passages such as that are proof that Matthew was written well into the 2nd century at the earliest.
2007-11-10 15:33:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Jesus was the first to be resurrected from the dead... but others followed... Jesus, when He died, went into the place of the dead where he preached to those who were waiting for him to conquer death....all the righteous dead from the past. They were then released from that place and Christ led them on high.... and until Christ ascended into heaven, they got to walk around the city of Jersalem.... and then Jesus took them all to heaven.... No one says they were causing trouble... They were not ghosts... Just resurrected people like Jesus was. Must have been interesting to talk to them...
2007-11-10 15:40:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by rejoiceinthelord 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
nicely, I climbed out of my grave returned 2 weeks in the past. actually approximately each 20- ninety years I come out for awhile. maximum folk i understand do it greater frequently. in keeping with threat you forgot mountaineering out of one of your graves recently. i visit in all probability circulate returned on down in it around March fifteenth 2011 to work out how previous' Julius Caesar is making out on beating up on Brutus, that stupid coward, sturdy previous Julius Caesar did no longer do lots incorrect in easy terms somewhat greater accepted and formidable than maximum and Brutus could no longer take it.
2016-12-08 18:10:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because "Night of the living dead" needed something to ripoff
2007-11-10 15:30:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because the one who wrote this had too much wine and this added a stick it in your face to all those Jews who wouldn't believe in Jesus.
2007-11-10 15:41:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Theban 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
BRAINS! BRAINS!
It was the original Night Of The Living Dead. ha ha ha
2007-11-10 16:00:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yinzer from Sixburgh 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The significance of this is the prophetic indication that Christ's death/resurrection guarantees our resurrection @ his return. His resurrection was a defeat over death.
2007-11-10 15:33:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by paula r 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The writers, prophets that they were, predicted movies like Dawn of the Dead would make millions from zombies, so they invented them! Sam Raimi thanks them!
2007-11-10 15:32:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brent Y 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Somebody must have been hallucinating when they wrote about that, or just plain lying.
2007-11-10 15:32:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋