Shorten the alphabet - translate, if you can.
What if it was decided that the letter 'c' should be dropped from the alphabet and should be replased by either the letter 'k' or 's', and also that the letter 'x' should be removed? The only kase in which 'c' would remain would be in the 'ch' formation.
Then it might be disided to reform the use of the letter 'w', so that 'which' and 'one' take the same konsonant, to replase 'y' with 'i' and fiks the 'g/j' anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear by iear bi doing awai with useless double konsonants, and modifiing vowlz and rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants.
It wud finali be posibl tu meik use of the ridandant letez 'c', 'y' and 'x'; -- bi now jast a memori in the mindz ov uold doderez -- tu replais 'ch', 'sh' and 'th' rispectivli.
Finali, zen, afta sum 20 iears ov orxogrefikl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirent speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
2007-11-10 09:34:35 · 3 answers · asked by Helen B 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
You SIMPLY Have an Idea !
he
2007-11-17 21:33:28 · answer #1 · answered by . 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This has been done many times before. What's the point? We'd have to learn an entirely new spelling concept and I guarantee people would still misspell as many words as they do today!
2007-11-10 10:22:48 · answer #2 · answered by Elaine P...is for Poetry 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sorry i prefer it the way it is.....too complicated for me LOL
2007-11-10 09:42:07 · answer #3 · answered by Bonnie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋