English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If it was philosophers wich one was an atheist? And why do you choose to follow him and what he says?

2007-11-10 08:41:41 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I didn't say I was a christian and religion isn't the church morales come from ppl that most likely have been involved in religion to somme degree and your TV shows when you were a kid were maybe made by religious folk. You say society and I would agree but how much of the good of society is taken from beliefs in something bigger?

2007-11-10 08:58:04 · update #1

Sam Harris is a good one and he even says that dissing religion is not a good idea!

2007-11-10 09:08:24 · update #2

this question does not ask for any emotion why do so many ppl need to put sommeone down when talkin about there beliefs and religion has lots to do with morales the ten commandments and only one person answered the question and no stars 37 responses to just diss someone without even answering the question what is the point were are the morales in that if I were defend my religion I wouldn't have to diss you this is how you wish to be treated that is a high standard we all aren't blessed with the wisdom some of you think you share

2007-11-10 09:20:25 · update #3

40 answers

The basis of all ethical social behavior is the perception that what hurts you can end up hurting me. In its most common form, it's called the Golden Rule, and it's based on experience, not some arbitrary supernatural authority. What religionists do is to appropriate these obvious standards and dress them up in imaginary authoritarian garb in order to get the attention of those who don't quite understand their relationship to the culture.

For a nice, non-theistic explanation of how a moral conscience develops, look into the work of child psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg.

2007-11-10 09:34:11 · answer #1 · answered by skepsis 7 · 3 0

My world is guided by fairness. As an agnostic, I get my morals and ethics from myself; I treat others as I would like to be treated, and as a rational being, I like to be treated well. But I also realize that others may not wish to be treated exactly the way I would like to be, and I take that into account whenever possible. I can figure out what's good and bad on my own, I don't need a god or a philosopher to spoon-feed me my ethics, though that's not to say I don't agree with bits and pieces of the principles of several religions and philosophers.

I'd also like to point out that not all philosophers are male.

2007-11-10 08:52:43 · answer #2 · answered by arfblat 3 · 3 0

For Christians, and believers of alternative persuasions as properly, the activity in morals and ethics is sensible, interior the experience that it is the main obvious ingredient to getting ideals interior the 1st place. Morals and ethics, nevertheless it is exciting discussing the changes between them, are the two concentrated on techniques of finding out between proper and incorrect. in case you have a concept that proper and incorrect exist in any respect, that's the place ideals are utilized to sensible judgements. Many atheists even have morals, ethics, or the two--it is, they have important concerns approximately proper and incorrect and the thank you to choose between them. (a truthful form of them are particularly concentrated on the concept that religious ideals reason people to make errors in those judgements--it is the substance of countless the arguments around right here.) in case you have not have been given those concerns, then you definitely're a distinctive style of atheist from those. yet that's by means of fact atheism could be the two related to a theory of proper and incorrect, or not. for many theists, the theory of proper and incorrect is already tied in with concept in a god or gods interior the 1st place.

2016-12-16 04:33:47 · answer #3 · answered by walpole 4 · 0 0

Morals and ethics have nothing to do
with religion. And whether religion has
high morals and ethical standards could
be questioned. The old testament is full
of stuff that would be considered highly
unethical if you keep the definition polite.

Morals and more important ethics are
a vital component to civilization. Without
basic ethics a civilization just would not
work. And without morals it would at least
be difficult.

2007-11-10 08:49:00 · answer #4 · answered by Alex S 5 · 3 0

Morality, as previously stated, has nothing to do with religion. Most atheists are humanists (most evangelicals equate this word to satanists), which means we care for the welfare of our fellow man. Atheists know that we are in this together, and no mythical creation will save us by whisking us away to a better place. We realize that, simply being alive is suffering, and that suffering is required to survive. Suffering forces one to evolve, both physically and spiritually, and as soon as one stops, that line is dead (unless, of course, it perfectly fills a niche). Thus, there is strength in numbers, and helping someone now means that they will have a chance to help you in return in the future (or so optimistic humans wish to believe).

If you wish to read more about the differences between morality and religion, I encourage you to check out some of the books by Sam Harris. Hope this helps!

2007-11-10 08:49:23 · answer #5 · answered by voidedlives 3 · 3 0

First, morals and ethics are not exclusive to religion---in fact, religion has a looong history of skewing or avoiding them all together.

Many people, if not most, have a conscience. That little voice inside that tells them if they're wrong or being a jerk. Many Atheists I have known have had morals and ethics that coincided with my own; and while I am not religious, I do have faith in and believe in God.

2007-11-10 08:46:46 · answer #6 · answered by Calliope 5 · 5 0

Mostly from Roy Rogers and Gene Autrey on Saturday Mornings at the Roxy and Bijou Theaters in Savannah, Georgia. The "Crash Gordon" and other Weekly Serials would have me thinking about the Good and Bad Guys all week. I always wanted to be one of the good guys with a white hat. No Sunday Morning Preachin accomplished more. I learned enough from my heroes on Saturday Mornings, I could and would compare scruples with anybody.

2007-11-10 08:43:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Some believe there is some "universal" moral code. If there were, we wouldn't need locks on our doors.
In actuality, each is free to come up with his own moral code which is derived from their experiences, genetics, education and "feelings". The problem is that everyone will eventually come up with a different moral code which can clash with that of others. Then we fall into anarchy.

2007-11-10 08:54:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Man is a tribal animal. It is instinctual to want to help others and to want to improve the lot of the pack. You will note that many religions have arisen in the history of man, with their own version of our beginning and of God. But the basic need to take care of other people, especially those closest to us, and to be honest, have been consistent. Morals are born or taught into people. It matters not whether you believe in Yahweh, Mother Nature or Oden.

2007-11-10 08:48:58 · answer #9 · answered by Baccheus 7 · 3 0

Morality is completely independent of religion. Morals are a function of society, upbringing, and your interaction with the environment. I don't follow what any philospoher says when determining morality. I internalized social rules as a child and make decisions about what is right and wrong by myself.

2007-11-10 08:46:58 · answer #10 · answered by love 6 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers