Is the Big Bang proof that a creative force exists?

Question

Boles, I am not a christian, I'm a pagan

Nightwind, you seem to be the only one who has picked up that I said creative force, not being!

Answer 1

you'd have to assume that something was behind the big bang. everything since then has been pretty much cause and effect, so you'd have to know what caused the big bang to say whether or not there was a creative force. all we have at the moment are hypothoses and faith.

Answer 2

First let us conceive about infinity ie infinite time and space.(Universe). Also assume that Universal energy pervades throughout the whole universe.and is in perpetual motion. Accumulation, condensation and finally explosion resulted in Big Bang leaving back Black Hole.This cosmic energy erupting from Big Bang resulted in the formation of the planetary bodies including this earth and where life form started.So every particle in the creation - living as well as the non-living has this energy. The process of creation started from Big Bang is only a natural evolutionary system till destruction and this process may be continuing in other parts of the universe too.
Assuming all this universal energy as God or god's manifestations then whole creation has evolved from God and so every thing including all living - human beings are the children of God and being energy,God can not have mind and so cannot think or see,which we all are told.We all are governed by invisible natural laws which the prophets could visualise and passed this knowledge for the benefit of the humanity (but the interpretations were distorted to suit personal interests) and subsequently termed as religions.

Answer 3

When you say a "creative force," do you mean something intelligent?

I don't think the Big Bang proves that there is a deity, if that is what you're getting at. Humanity has a habit of attributing things they can't explain to a supernatural being. We don't know what started the Big Bang. We don't know how that material came into being. We don't even know the physics involved in the first fraction of a second after the Bang. But just because we cannot currently explain it does not mean that we will never be able to explain it. It just means that we don't currently know everything. We are not all-knowing.

Answer 4

Definitely not a proof of anything.
Keep in mind that the proper name for the "Big Bang Theory" is the much less interesting sounding "Hot Inflationary Cosmological Model"

Answer 5

Possibly. But we don't even know enough about the Big Bang to come to that conclusion just yet. It could have easily been caused by some other mysterious force.

Answer 6

no. It is proof that energy exists, but not that the energy is creative in the sense of putting one atom here and another atom there, deliberately and with a specific creative something intended to be created. It doesn't prove that it isn't all random.

Answer 7

I think the only thing it proves that the universe is cyclical. Whether or not there's an intelligent reason for that being so, we don't know. And it doesn't prove it.

Answer 8

There is no proof of either. Why do Christians look for a scientific explanation for a faith based institution

Answer 9

Yes, explosions of any kind reaffirm that a force exists that creates destruction.
I don't know of any explosion that brings order. "Big Bang(s)" only create more chaos.

Answer 10

No, in no way. Bobby Jim - the 'big bang' was not an explosion.