As a submariner I gotta say, there is NO room to segregate women (seperate showers bunks, etc) so, until we get bigger subs the answer is no
2007-11-11 14:02:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by joseph b 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Submarines are extremely close quarters,. There is no such thing as a private moment. From the rack to the head to the shower you are always sharing space with someone. And until much larger subs are built with new designs, creating separate quarters, heads and showers is simply not practical. At this point in time I don't think a submarine could be made into a non-hostile workplace for a female unless it had an all female crew. I'm not saying that they would be in danger. But they would be constantly under the eyes of a lot of horny men. Then there is the issue of rampant prositution and pregnancy on navy ships. How much worse would it be without seeing daylight for 3 months?
2007-11-10 05:41:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by James L 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
Yes. Most jobs in the Navy are well suited to be performed by male and female personnel. There are already two or more countries that have successfully integrated their crews with few problems.
Modern American nuclear subs are sufficient to accommodate male and female crew members. There are several berthing compartments and even those can be segregated into smaller areas to improve privacy. Trident missile subs are especially well suited for mixed crews as they have over a dozen 9-bed staterooms in the middle level of the missile compartment. Showers and toilets can be used by males and females as crew members do not have to disrobe prior to entering.
Those that can not adjust to mixed crews in the future will have to leave as the Navy will not be able to accommodate those who are too prejudiced to work with others.
2007-11-10 12:01:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by ranb40 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
it rather is time for us adult men to climb down off our "he-guy" pedestals and settle for that this modification isn't nicely worth getting your boxers in a knot. Do you already know that at present greater effective than 50% of the engineering pupils in college are lady? To functionality an officer on a nuke sub you should carry an engineering degree, and the checklist of practicable applicants is shrinking. in the event that they have the degree then enable them to serve. in case you examine the object you will have suggested they're in basic terms permitting lady officers into this gadget in the present day, with the aid of cost of coming up alterations to the subs to house lady team. by utilising proscribing it to officers they could stay away from the cost, considering the fact that officers have their own areas for berthing, as against distinctive team areas for enlisted. on the subject of the comments from the frontal lobe impaired... only with the aid of fact somebody is lady does not mean adult men gets to have intercourse with them, or sexually harass them. we are conversing officers right here. i don't be attentive to many adult men who're keen to throw away a military occupation with an particularly alluring bonus only to make stupid and insensitive comments not in basic terms to a woman yet an officer besides. In my occupation i develop into fortunate to attend a technical training course with quite a few submariners, and at the same time as they have been as regular as the different GI I met, they have been actually expert and carried out themselves with the utmost decorum. i think of we are able to have confidence them to accomplish their obligations with a mixed boat of officers over them. And for the checklist, another allied submarine rigidity has women serving.
2016-09-28 23:24:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No , put a woman under water for six months and it is not a good thing. Anywhere else, but not Submarines.
2007-11-10 13:09:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Norskeyenta 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Men react differently to being given orders from (or to) women than they do being given orders from (or to) men.
Women react differently to being given orders from (or to) men than they do being given orders from (or to) women.
For good or bad that's just the way it is.
Whether or not women can or can't do the job should be only a secondary consideration.
The combat effectiveness of such a mixed gender crew, when compared to an all male crew, should be the only criteria.
2007-11-10 07:45:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by George B 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I never thought they'd be on aircraft carriers or wearing CRACKER JACK uniforms (jumper, neckerchief), but they do both. AND they fly combat aircraft (lady at church is a US Marine F-18 pilot) and a female pilot on the Roosevelt back in 2001 blew the snot out of some Al-Qaida installations.
Who knows, women might be on subs one day. They've proven themselves elsewhere.
(USN, retired)
2007-11-10 12:58:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by AmericanPatriot 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Why not? Very few of the jobs on a submarine require excessive upper body strength, so strength is not an issue. Size is an issue to some extent. Submarines are cramped, so smaller people tend to have less trouble than larger ones. Since women tend to be smaller than men, they may have an advantage on a submarine. The only problems I see are related to segregated showers, washrooms, and bunks. This should be a simple matter to resolve.
2007-11-10 05:37:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
6⤋
if any woman is crazy enough to handle the unique stressors of such an environment without getting her panties in a knot and crying sexual harassment after spending one cruise with your average Bubble head, more power to her.
2007-11-10 06:41:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mrsjvb 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I thnink they should be allowed to serve as long as they carry their own weight as far as the duties go. I am a female veteran and when I was in the military, I saw too many females try to get out of doing physical labor because they were females. I found this practice annoying and not fair to the males in my company.
2007-11-10 05:39:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by sdkidduran 4
·
5⤊
4⤋