Ya ok, but still Bush would go into Britain and say: Friend, we are in need of your oil or whatever :P
He's a born liar, you know.
Accusing Iraq to have WMD and now look, where is it?
I'm not in the mood to talk about him, he's proved to be a maniac or even worse.
2007-11-10 08:12:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by @hm@d {War Against Noub!} 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think that Mr Bush would think before doing this.
Dear brother, be aware that these people have done a lot of hard work and spent lots of money as a preparation for a campaign on Iraq for example, the hard work and money I aim at were spent to "disintegrate" us as Arabs and Muslims into weak small warring nations, then we are a tasty bite for them, they just crop what they have planted for a long time, I hope we begin planting so we , or our sons at least, crop what we plant, but driven by our religion we won't plant hatred or envy, we really need to plant love and unity.
2007-11-12 14:36:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Green visitor is back :D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Bush were invading nations due to oil then why is it mexico was not invaded...it's just south of the US. The suply lines would be a lot shorter Its just down the road in texas and we both share the gulf of mexico.
judging from the immigration situation you could probably get Mexican suport if you granted
every one citizenship ater anexing them.
2007-11-10 12:41:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is actually but most British oil is produced from the North Sea
2007-11-10 12:44:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
England, no.
But the UK is a major producer of oil from the North Sea.
2007-11-10 12:40:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
you do know that america gets most of its oil from canada and south america right? and england has oil there is oil all over the world we have it here in texas and alaska and its not just in the middle east more oil get produced in dubai and we are friends with them
2007-11-10 16:48:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Please don't be frustrated. Mr. Bush is not toatally responsible. The global masters would not allow him to authorize war without their approval.
2007-11-10 12:48:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by JesusIsTheAnswer 4
·
0⤊
1⤋