If God didn't create the world then how did things get started?

Question

What were things like immediately before the big bang?

Answer 1

There was total chaos and then order and harmony.

It just happened.

LOL Good question

Answer 2

This is a good and fair question. Some (Stephen Hawkins) say that it doesn't matter. I believe it does and has been a question i have thought about since i was about 10 (of course not all the time). A few years ago i came to realize that how we think about some fundamental things were wrong and that, i believe, has lead us to the the wrong fundamental conclusion. I am not going to disclose what i believe here or at this time. I still need to do more research on it. But it is simple, well partly. But still no God.

Answer 3

We will never know. Even science is lost before Plank's time. Something like 10^-43 seconds after big bang itself.

And if God exists, who created it ?

Answer 4

Strangely, evolutionists who address this can only go far as "we can know for certainty to 10 to the minus 23 seconds after the Big Bang".

If they did, they'd have to address the eternity of either matter (and energy and information) or who made the matter, energy and information.

Then they have the Origin of Life and Origin of DNA hurdles they cannot cross. Organisms also have reproductive, repair, nervous and many other systems that cannot be replicated by chance.

Is is any wonder so many of us see Creation as the only possible alternative?

Answer 5

We will probably never know what things were like immediately before the big bang.

How did God get started?

Answer 6

We don't know and cannot know,to be honest.I personally have no problem with someone calling the reason "god".As long as you get it that it happened 14 billion years ago,and that means it WASN'T created 6,000 years ago.I am not against a belief in God.I am against the willful rejection of knowledge.The BB happened,if you wish to believe a god caused it ,fine.At least you are fitting reality into your definition of God.That's all I could ask

Answer 7

If God created then universe, then who created God?

Or, if you say God always existed, why not just say the universe always existed? Either way, you're left with as many questions as before. I figured this one out back when my age was in single digits.

Next!

Answer 8

God was always here before Adam and Eve.He did create grass, trees, water, alll animals and living things,the sky everything.

Answer 9

No-one knows.

That kind of honesty gets me called an 'atheist' by religious people who claim to know.

Their kind of 'knowledge' I get to call 'dishonest', because it is merely belief, not knowledge.

I do not know if things 'started' even. How do I know that this Universe isn't a by product of a multiverse that exists both in and in and out of our principles of time and matter?

I don't know this to be untrue. And neither do you. However, i prefer to be honest and state that I don't know.

Answer 10

GOD (YHVH) created al that is, was, and ever will be.
Here are a few thing that evolutionist may be interested in...
Evolution is a religion to. So it is a state-sponsored religion? This is blatently unconstitutional.
A lot of evolutionists think creationist are dumb because we refuse to believe in the "Evidence" for evolution. (what evidence?) and we believe things that they think violate the laws of physics. What they don't seem to realize is that Evolution violets the laws if physics. How can a rock tun into a person, or an animal, or a plant?
And for those that do not thing you believe that we came from a rock, read on...
Evolution teaches that we came from animals.
Evolution teaches that animals came from Amphibians.
Evolution teaches that Amphibians come from sea life.
Sea life from single-cell life.
Single cell life from chemicals.
Chemicals from rocks that were rained on for years.
Conclusion, all live came from rocks.
Which is more likely, that an intelligent created life, or that nothing did, and what about bio-genesis?

The Evolutionist base their belief in Evolution on the fact that “Micro-evolution” is true. What they do not tell is that there are 6 different meanings to the word Evolution, and only “Micro-evolution” has ever been observed.
1) Cosmic Evolution (Never Observed) The creation of time, space and matter. (The Big Bang)
2) Chemical Evolution (Never Observed) Production of heavy elements from hydrogen.
3) Steller Evolution (Never Observed) The formation of stars, planets, and solar systems.
4) Organic Evolution (Never Observed) Life from random chemical.
5) Macro-Evolution (Never Observed) One animal mutating into another.
6) Micro-Evolution. (Observed) Slight changes in a species. A better name for this would be “Adaptation”

The Sun is Shrinking.
Does the size of the sun change over the years? Recently, "John A. Eddy (Harvard -Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and High Altitude Observatory in Boulder) and Aram A. Boornazian (a mathematician with S. Ross and Co. in Boston) have found evidence that the sun has been contracting about 0.1% per century--?? corresponding to a shrinkage rate of about 5 feet per hour.
o.1% would mean a half-life of 10,000 years, so 10,000 years ago, it would be twice as big as it is now, 20,000 years, 4 times as big, 30,000 years, 8 times as big...
The inverse square law means the gravity would be 64 times then what it is now. What would it be in 65 million years?

Carbon dating is based on 3 assumptions that can not be proven.
1. The amount of carbon-14 in the body is the same as in the air.
2. The amount that was in it at the time of death is the same as in the air today.
3. Nothing has removed or washed-out any of the carbon-14
4. The rate of decay is a constant.
1,3,and 4 are assumptions. There is no way to prove them.
2 was proven wrong at lest twice, never proven right. The amount of Carbon-14 in the air is still increasing.

The Geological Columns.
Evolutionist believe that the Geological Columns prove that the Earth is millions of years old because each layer is a different age. What they do not tell is that the layers are not even. There could be 50 layers in 1 spot, 30 layers a mile away. And 80 layers another mile.
Also they do not tell that there are trees and animals buried in the layers crossing dozens of layers and some time upside down.
There is only 2 possibilities for this...
1) The plant or animal was there for centuries waiting to be buried before it decayed. Many of the trees would have to balance upside-down, and many animal, such as whales, would have to balance on their tail fins against wind, rain, and vibrations from other animals walking/running for centuries.
2. The plant or animal was buried quickly. This would require that they be under water since only water makes dirt settle in layers quickly.

From what information I have been able to get, the proof that a T-Rex is a carnivores is because the teeth are long and sharp. The problems with this are...
1) Many animals have sharp teeth and don’t eat meat,.
2) The arms of a T-Rex are to short to hold a animal as he ripped the flesh from it. (That would not be a problem if it was a herbivore)
3) The teeth are so poorly rooted that one bite into a piece of meat would pull them all out by the roots and the T-Rex would have to gum the animal to death, and all other animals after that.
4) A T-Rex is only about 10% to 20% bigger then a elephant, and runs about then same speed.

The Van-Allen Radiation Belt.

The Earths Magnetic field is slowly getting weaker. It has a half-life of 1450 years. This means that it is losing ½ of its strength every 1450 years.
Time Magnetic strength
2,000 AD 1
555 AD 2
900BC 4
2,350BC 8
3,800BC 16
About 6000 years ago (The time of Genesis) it would have been about 16 times as strong as it is now. A magnet field of that power would stop the venom of snakes from being harmful.
About 4000 to 4500 years ago (The time of The Great Flood) it would have been about 8 times as strong as now.
About 2000 years ago (The time Of Jesus, The Christ) it would have been about 3 times as strong as now.
Now, lets see how strong it would have been just 50,000 years ago.
5,250BC 32
6,700BC 64
8,150BC 128
9,600BC 256
11,050BC 512
12,500BC 1,024
13,950BC 2,048
15,400BC 4,096
16,850BC 8,192
18,300BC 16,384
19,750BC 32,768
21,200BC 65,536
22.650BC 131,072
23,100BC 262,144
25,550BC 524,288
27,000BC-1,048,576
28,450BC-2,097,152
29,900BC-4,194,304
31,350BC-8,388,608
32,800BC-16,777,216
34,250BC-33,554,432
35,700BC-67,108,864
37,150BC-134,217,728
38,600BC-268,435,456
40.050BC-536,870,912
41,500BC-1,073,741,824
42,950BC-2,147,483,648
44,400BC-4,294,467,296
45,850BC-8,589,934,592
47,300BC-17,179,869,184
48,750BC-34,359,738,368
50,200BC-68,719,476,736

Sixty eight Billion, Seven hundred and nineteen Million, Four hundred and seventy six thousand, seven hundred and thirty six times what is it now.

What would it have been 65,000,000 years ago?

Many Evolutionist claim that the reason the Earths magnetic field is getting weaker is because it is reversing. They say that it has reversed several times in history. If this was true then that would mean that every time it reversed, there would be a time of neutral magnetic field. This would mean that there was no magnetic field at these times. If there is no magnetic field, then there is no Van-Allen Radiation belt, and all the X-Rays, Gamma-Rays, and other forms of radiation from the sun would hit the earth directly, destroying all life on the land, and making the oceans hot enough to boil cooking all life in the waters. Evolution would have to start all over after every reversal.

How do stars form?
There are many ideas about this subject, but no way to know for sure.
Some believe that stars form from clouds of gases collecting together. As they compress closer together, they get hotter and finally ignite into a star.
This has been proven to be impossible. As the gases collect, there would be 2 forces at work. The gravity pulling them together, and the pressures pushing them apart. The pressure pushing them apart would be between 50 and 100 times stronger then the gravity pulling them together. This would be like a balloon inflating itself from the gravity of the air inside pulling more air in with no help from a outside source.
Another possible explanation would be that a star or supernova explodes close to the gas cloud.
The problem with this idea is that the shock wave would not compress the gases, it would sweep then away and scatter them even more then they are so that they can not collect. Look at a leaf blower.
Another possible explanation is that 20 stars explode at the same time all around this gas cloud.
The problem with this idea is that 20 stars would have to die for 1 to form. 400 stars would have to die for those 20 to exist, and 8,000 would have to die for those 400 to exist, and 160,000 to make them. How far back can it go, and how did the first generation of stars from?

The several stages of evolution have all been proven to be wrong.
1) Lucy.
A 3 foot skeleton of a chimp, the “evidence” that she was becoming human was her knee joint, which was found more then a mile away, and over 200 feet in the earth.
2) Heidelberg Man.
Built by a jaw bone that was considered to be quite human.
3) Nebraska Man.
Built from a pigs tooth
4) Piltdown Man.
The jaw was a modern ape
5) Peking Man.
Lived 500,000 years ago, but no remains were ever found.
6) Neanderthal Man.
Old Man with arthritis.
7) New Guinea man.
?
8) Gro-Magnon Man.
Skeletal Structure is exactly the same as modern man.

I could go on for several pages, but I think this is enough for now.

Answer 11

hate to break it to you, but there was no big bang
god created the universe and everything in it
and a lot of people will ask what started god
but othin did
he was just there, because he is almight y ad nothing needs to start him