Hey O J haters ---- the worst they can get him with is bad judgment, even if found quilty on one or two lesser charges its unlikly he will do time. So quit hoping he'll do life for murders that he was found innocent of. Short jail term maybe--- Probation IS MORE PROBABLE ---- ACQUITTED WOULD BE TRUE JUSTICE
2007-11-09 23:26:42 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
You support a criminal? I am sure he appreciates it. Maybe he will invite you to his next "burglary".
2007-11-09 23:43:23 · answer #1 · answered by randall7665 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Kharma is a !@#$% I believe he is guilty of the murders, but he was aquitted.... He will probably get probation or a light sentence, but wouldnt it be nice if the judga threw the book at hi? At any rate, what comes around goes around, I am not a religious woman but.... and lest he be judged first and foremost by his maker!!
2007-11-09 23:38:59 · answer #2 · answered by Miss Rhonda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. it relatively is a uncommon occurrence while a black man or woman gets off for the blatant homicide of a blonde haired white female. And to that end the regularly occurring public of black persons cheered while the Juice have been given off. OJ Simpson basically proved that money talks...LOUDLY. there are a number of miscarriages interior the yankee justice gadget. it relatively is not suited. in spite of the undeniable fact that it relatively is the popular form of justice globally. what's racist? Who between us can declare to be "racially organic" AND does it relatively count form in 2006?
2016-10-16 00:10:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are you bothering to ask a question if you want everybody to know what your answer to OJ's situation is. Perhaps you should ask to sit as the presiding judge in this case since you already know the results. You can save the state a lot of money and can claim to be the present "Nostradamus". thank God there are people like you to be Judge & Jury. Hopefully you will never have to be judged by a Jury for a crime you may or may not have committed.
2007-11-09 23:36:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
well rocco my dear man, here is the real story. as for the murder charges, oj was found innocent and that was the correct verdict. all of the evidence presented in the case proved that oj was at the murder scene at the time of the murders, however, being there does not mean he committed the crime, with out a murder weapon, no witnesses, then no conviction. now with the robbery charge, we have not heard all of the evidence yet, but my feeling to this point is that the person who set oj up should to some jail time, not oj. like anyone else, you would fight for what is yours.
2007-11-09 23:42:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It must be nice to black in America. You can kill white people and get away with it simply by saying you were driven to it by racism. Don't worry, though. The law has been waiting to get even with this bastard for a long time. He's going away because...
Cochran is dead,
Mason is disbarred,
poor little OJ -
can't play the race card.
2007-11-10 02:44:58 · answer #6 · answered by nickyboy666 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree that he will be either probed, or acquitted. We are, as mere humans, not in a position to truly judge. If he has done some bad things in the past, he WILL PAY. Just not here on earth. There will be a time for judgement. Making the judgement is not my place. I will throw no stones.
2007-11-09 23:30:38 · answer #7 · answered by BirdogsID 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Ok, our judicial system is not perfect and may show preferential treatment to celebrities. However, If YOU did what he did, you'd fry like an egg. That has nothing to do with black or white, rich or poor, celebrity or not. Fair is fair.
Careful though, the same injustice you seem to celebrate may one day bite YOU in the a**.
2007-11-09 23:30:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
OJ WAS JUST AS GUILTY AS A PERPETRATOR IN THIS SCENARIO.
THREE OF THE ACTORS PLEAD GUILTY.
ONE OTHER ACTOR PLEAD TO TURN EVIDENCE ON OJ.
THE MAN WHO WAS ROBBED GOT HIS SPORTS MEMORABILIA BACK?
DROPPED CHARGES?
OJ WAS SIGNING HIS NEW BOOK?
IF THIS IS NOT ONE HECK OF A GOOD PUBLICITY STUNT I DO NOT KNOW WHAT ELSE IT IS. (OJ'S BOOK WAS BANNED BY THE FAMILY OF NICOLE AND NOW THIS ACT SURFACES AND OJ WALKS?? HOW MUCH DID HE PAY THE OWNER OF THE MEMORABILIA TO DO THIS SETUP FOR PUBLICITY. OF COURSE HIS ITEMS WILL NOW QUADRUPLE IN PRICE)
SAY YA DON'T DO OJ. AT LEAST THIS TIME WE DID NOT HAVE TO WATCH OJ'S HIGHWAY RUN OF SHAME.
2007-11-10 00:31:35 · answer #9 · answered by ahsoasho2u2 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
So because he may or may not have been aware that his buddies had guns. So what? That is like the getaway driver driver saying, I never saw any guns. If O.J. or anyone else is part of a crime, they are part of the crime and courts treat them as one, in theory.
2007-11-09 23:36:43 · answer #10 · answered by Bob D 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋