So why don't more people support the one republican candidate that can beat Hillary Clinton?

Question

Yes you guessed it Ron Paul would have our country looking back to there roots. Tho she is clever and Witty she can't stand up to the champion of the constitution, Ron Paul.

Answer 1

It would be an interesting match up.
I personally think that Hillary is her own worst enemy and her own actions and words can easily be used against her by any candidate that knows how to show her for what she is.

Answer 2

I am an older person too, and I support Ron Paul. I remember what it was like when it was still fashionable to be free. I want that for my grandchildren, and that is why I will support Ron Paul.
In the last 30 years, I have watched our taxes go through the roof, our jobs go to other countries,(manufacturing and industry), our schools disintegrate, our families have to fight for the right to exist, God being ostracized, people losing hope, quality of life in general deteriorating to the point where there is no hope, because people feel that they have no control over the direction of their country.
If the word American is to mean anything at all, we have to take back our country. The only way we can do this is to vote for someone who isn't owned by big money interests.
All the "top tier" candidates and the news media are.

We need to bring back hope for our young people. We had it, and we have a responsibility to give it to them.

Answer 3

Because a lot of ppl do research... and when they do that research they find that just because Ron Paul voted against the war, does not mean he is their candidate of choice. Ron Paul happens to be a far right extremist that has no answers for fixing anything.

Answer 4

Ron Paul does not get as much media exposure as
Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney .Ron Paul is certainly a
formidable candidate .I do not believe the media push polls .Ron Paul has good principles and morals as opposed to Hillary Clinton who has bad principles and almost no morals .

Answer 5

I'm an older person, and Ron Paul is the only real choice.
He ran in '88 as a libertarian and was disallowed now as a real republican he has the values the Dems should look at as well as Republicans Clinton is Clinton same old names same old values Bill was a terrible president, you guys are probably too young to remember, I don't mean that in a condescending way but in reality most of the people on this topic are in there early 20's.

NAFTA was his brain child, and that is what opened the doors for China and all of our manufacturing jobs going to other countries.

Answer 6

As a young person (23), I tend to wonder why so many of my fellow young people, whether liberal or conservative, support Ron Paul, and yet so many of the older people seem not to.

The whole world knows the United States is approaching a time where it abandons the mainstream captilist, partisan political rhetoric, and Ron Paul happens to be the candidate that is testing the water to see if the country will actually vote that way already. More than the voters though, it's the powers in place in this country that will stifle him as quickly as possible. Fox News has already made the first and most blatant attempt.

Answer 7

No republican is going to beat any democratic candidate for the presidential election. The people now realize the error of their ways in 2004.

Answer 8

You're serious aren't you?

Although I wouldn't vote for Shrillary if she were the last candidate on earth, Ron Paul has about as much chance of beating her in an election as any homelesss person on the street.

In fact, homeless people might poll slightly better.

Answer 9

Ron would be better then King George any day. I hope all the conservatives pray that Rudy does not get the ticket.

Answer 10

I agree. If Paul was on the ballot, he has my vote. But since the Republicans don't recognize true conservatism when they see it, I'll vote for Clinton or whomever the Democrat on the ballot is.