English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

Neither, I am a Buddhist and an atheist.

2007-11-09 14:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by 5 · 8 0

Neither, I simply have no belief in God. I still have ties to various religions and get in on community service, so even though I never was a member of any religion, it can't be said I ever abandoned it. And saying "religion abandoned me" would imply that religion was in the right to begin with and changed in some negative way.

Religion isn't something I'm trying to avoid because I see it in a negative light, it simply is based upon faulty reasoning.

2007-11-09 14:17:45 · answer #2 · answered by ‫‬‭‮‪‫‬‭‮yelxeH 5 · 2 0

Neither, I just don't see any evidence for any religion as being true.

I was a Christian for about 35 years, but when I started learning about how much we know about evolution and cosmology I realized that creationists were lying through their teeth (maybe through ignorance, but still totally wrong). I thought that archeology would support the Bible, seriously we all heard that there is more evidence for Jesus than Caesar, only to find that this was a bold faced lie as well. Not only was Creation shot down, but the flood, the tower of Babel, the Exodus, and every single miraculous event recorded by the bible.

Edit:
Do you realize that you are an atheist to more gods than you believe in? Basically the difference between you and an atheist is just one god.... many others have many gods and even accept that other gods than their own exist.

2007-11-09 14:20:07 · answer #3 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2 0

I didn't abandon religion and it never abandoned me. I simply decided to learn all I could both religious and scientific and in doing so I realized that religion no longer intrested me. Religion in fact bores me. Learning about how a star is formed, or about gamma bursts, or studing the millions upon millions of insects that inhabit the earth, or any of a multitude of different things was far more exciting than studing a 2000 year old belief system. There are far greater things to focus on than the beliefs of the past.

2007-11-09 14:21:40 · answer #4 · answered by Paul B 4 · 3 0

Stop the presses! Gypsy knows what the problem is with the world!!

And, "perhaps it's time for us the non religious to see people as having something wrong with them for needing a religion..."

How long have You been reading R&S, dear Gypsy? That's not a new idea among Atheists. Why this angry answer? Nothing like this was implied in the question.

Kris, how (and WHY) do You dedicate Your whole life to NO BELIEFS?

2007-11-09 14:26:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I abandoned religion many years ago. For the sake of religion, I sincerely hope it has abandoned me.

2007-11-09 14:17:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I don't feel there is abandonment on either side. I just never really believed the stories.

You can try to claim negative emotions as an excuse, but there is no excuse for lack of evidence.

2007-11-09 14:23:37 · answer #7 · answered by DogmaBites 6 · 1 0

I consciously abandoned it, starting with seeing through much of it at age 12 and finally stepping up to the plate at 15. That was 50-plus years ago and nothing has occurred during that time to change my mind, In fact, my atheism grows stronger with the passing of each day, accentuated by much of the garbage spouted by the childishly-deluded on these forum pages.

2007-11-09 14:19:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Oh religion defiantly never abandoned me. It was trying its best to cling on but I managed to escape. It was more like a prison break than an abandonment.

2007-11-09 14:16:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9 0

Abandonment implies that there was once a connection. I had common sense from the beginning

2007-11-09 14:14:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I deserted it for the fact that there is actual no helping information for the existence of any of the hundreds of proposed deities that have popped up over the years. additionally, it annoys me while non secular human beings act like their faith is the main mandatory. notably in u . s . a ., Christians act like they are the only faith in the country and all of politics ought to conform to their perspectives. There are 2 problems with that. variety one, they do no longer look to be the only non secular group in u . s . a .. variety 2, each and each Christian has a various view of how their faith works, so which you will no longer be able to conform to all and sundry's perspectives. additionally, the Bible is merely a gaggle of fairy thoughts. There are 5 important religions in the international, all of which declare to be ideal and state that others are incorrect. So who's familiar with? I effective do no longer, so why stick to a faith in case you do no longer even comprehend what one is authentic? the fact that there is not any longer merely one everyday faith that makes up majority of the earth's human beings makes me comprehend that faith isn't authentic. If one became authentic, then we could all be following it ideal now.

2016-10-02 00:24:45 · answer #11 · answered by shantae 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers