New evidence, ocean bacteria responsible for CO2 and Global Warming.
http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=14451
Skeptics, do you feel vindicated tonight?
2007-11-09 13:06:23 · 6 answers · asked by Author Unknown 6 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
I'm getting the feeling nobody even looked at the link.
2007-11-09 18:42:46 · update #1
Uh, Keith? She knew that. It's sarcasm.
I looked at the link.
2007-11-09 18:55:28 · answer #1 · answered by Bob 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
At least the skeptics after embracing such a theory, check out the facts and found it was a hoax. Unlike the alarmist who rushed to embrace a flawed theory on temperature reconstruction (the hockey stick graph), because it fit their dogma. Even though it has been proved to be a flaw, you still embrace it. What is more the study was done with the purpose of creating alarm.
“With the publication of the article in Science [in 1995], I
gained significant credibility in the community of scientists
working on climate change. They thought I was one of
them, someone who would pervert science in the service of
social and political causes. So one of them let his guard
down. A major person working in the area of climate
change and global warming sent me an astonishing email
that said “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm
Period.”
Source: Presentation by S McIntyre At Conference Stockholm Sweden, September 9 2006
So who is worse?
2007-11-10 00:07:07 · answer #2 · answered by eric c 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they were wrong all along. The bacteria story was a hoax.
2007-11-10 02:05:08 · answer #3 · answered by Keith P 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not a believer/skeptic thing. It's just adhering to the basic principals of objective science.
2007-11-09 21:11:10 · answer #4 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Ocean bacteria? That we put in there because of our endless waste dumping?
2007-11-09 21:24:53 · answer #5 · answered by ChaiTea 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
You know I wouldn't lie to you... â¼ it's the sun...â£
2007-11-09 22:01:19 · answer #6 · answered by Tomcat 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋