Who on EARTH is the whack job who started the rumor that the theory of evolution states we came from ROCKS?

Answer 1

'Dr' Kent Hovind.

Who else?

Answer 2

no reproduction and pasting? Bummer. How a pair of entire record of links? ok, the elementary concept of evolution is that no longer something became itself into each and every thing because of the fact evolutionist don't have self assurance that there is a writer. technology demands that technology might desire to be observable, and reproducible. although the thought of evolution might desire to declare that each and every thing befell see you later in the past that it could't be stated. Evolution claims that the alterations from the rock to the fish befell so slowly that it would desire to no longer be stated, neither might desire to it is reproduced. Evolution claims that the lacking links between the rock and the fish are...nicely, lacking, so as that it could't be stated. Evolution seems on the right comparable information that Creationist inspect. ie: the rock, and the fish. Evolutionist accuse Creationist of having no information, and that because of the fact advent can't be reproduced or stated, it is not any longer technology. Evolution claims that Creationism holds employer the claims of Scripture and does not replace that stance based on the creation of diverse theories or information chanced on. (authentic) as damaging to the declare that technology holds to theories, and alter what it believes and is prepared to alter their ideals while new information or theories are presented - although, evolution insist that there is not any God, and is thoroughly unwilling to alter, Evolution takes the information (such because of the fact the rock or fish) write a tale approximately how they think of they got here into being, draw photos approximately how they think of the fish regarded billions of years in the past, and present day their tale and drawing as though it have been genuine information. Evolutionist are no longer able to comprehend that what they have is a perception device (ie faith). yet while a Creationist who can inspect the information, see the way it lines up in Scripture, have a replaced existence hence of what God has executed of their lives, the evolutionist dismisses it considering's in accordance with faith... New information alongside with Mt. St. Helen's that disproves lots of evolutions theories, is skipped over. Miracles are skipped over. Prophecy (and its fulfillment) is skipped over. Archeology that lines up with Scripture is skipped over. Astronomy that lines up with Scripture is skipped over. the only element of Scripture that the evolutionist needs to snatch a carry of is their own information of it - and that, merely so as that they are able to undertaking it onto people who comprehend God and comprehend Scripture.

Answer 3

Fred Flintstone

Answer 4

Chris Rocks??

Answer 5

Probably the same who came up with the
evolution from todays monkeys crap. Most
creationists have no clue about evolution
but apparently don't get tired to bash on
what they think evolution is.

Answer 6

Pretty funny. But after time I bet it will change to coming from a gaseous state or an explosion. It's a big playing field out there.

Answer 7

It is a way of deriding "Evolutionists". It is a sort of straw-man defense.

Actually though, it is not far from an oversimplified version of the truth about what science claims was the origin of life.

Answer 8

Well at the risk of being called "Woo-woo" if Adam was created from dirt then we did come from rocks.

Answer 9

what caused the soup that life came from. it rained on the rocks for millions of years

Answer 10

the same guy who summed up the genesis account by saying that men came from mud. we can believe it or not, but we should admit that it's a little more complicated than that.

Answer 11

Yeh, like everyone knows we came from star dust.