What arguments would you use to disprove the theory of evolution?

Question

Precise facts, internet links and bibliographical references are welcome. Thanks :)
To the people who adhere to Darwinism: I think that your beliefs make you unfit to answer this question. So just don't. Thank you.

Answer 1

If a big bang occured would that create order or disorder?
During the bombings of Hiroshima, what do we see? Things tend towards choas and disorder, just like any physical structure or human being. Do you believe that you came into existance from a infintesimally small concentration of matter that exploded? If a frog turns into a handsome prince quickly we all know it’s a fairy tale, but if a frog turns into a prince slowly it is modern science. The fact of the matter is, there is no transitional forms to prove evolution. Also there is no evidence for the following forms of evolution
Cosmic Evolution- The evolution of time, space, and matter.
Chemical Evoltuion- The evolution of higher elements from hydrogen
Stellear and Planetary Evolution. Origin of stars and planets
Organic Evolution- Origin of Life
Macro Evolution- Changing from 1 kind to another

The only Evolution that exists is Micro Evolution small changes within a specie. There has never been a positve mutation, or a mutation that has added genetic material. DNA is also proof of a designer because it is genetic information that cannot be created.

If you look at Mount Rushmore, you would have to conclude that the presidents were carved by men, and not a product of chance. This is the same reason, creation must have a creator.

Also if the Big Bang is responsible for all of creation, why is their so many contraditions found, like most of the planets rotate backwards, as well as the moons. Nobody has ever witness a star being formed,yet we see countless shooting stars. All of the planets in our universe have entirely different compositions. If you're honest you would have to conclude evoution is a joke. The illumanti created evolution to destory Christianity, not because they believed it.

Answer 2

I agree with the theory of evolution but I also agree that an Alien life form could have possibly speed up the process. "The Lost Book Of Enki" considered mythology in a christian based society. There is some really awesome stuff in that book that we are just now finding but this book even talks about the face on mars and was written on tablets 5000 B.C. pretty amazing.

Answer 3

There are many things that could falsify evolution if they were found. A couple of examples are mammal fossils in the precambrian rocks. Mammals with avian features, such as feathers. Bat wings don't count as they are modified mammalian arm, not avian wings. Birds with teats. So far, these things have never been found, but if they were they would falsify evolution.

Answer 4

I always rely on the Banana and Peanut Butter arguments.

In summary, the Banana argument proves God's existence because a banana is shaped just right for human orifices. (Cucumbers, too...just ask my wife...)

The Peanut Butter argument proves that if evolution were true, we should expect to find new life forms in every jar of peanut butter.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLqQttJinjo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZFG5PKw504

This is hard science people. Darwin was wrong. LOL.

Answer 5

The DNA sequences in a ‘higher’ organism (such as a human) code for structures and functions unknown in the sort of ‘primitive first cell’ from which all other organisms are said to have evolved.
NONE of the alleged proofs of ‘evolution in action’ provide a single example of functional new information being added to genes. Rather, they all involve sorting and loss of information.

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=4278&program=CSC%20-%20Views%20and%20News

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2177

Answer 6

To disprove Darwinism you merely have to offer an explanation for the creation of organisms that is better and more universally verifiable that evolution. It really is as simple as that.

Answer 7

Sad that your mind is so closed. The very fact that you don't want to hear validates this. It shows that you are not looking for truth but justification for the beliefs that you already posses. I am sorry that you have chosed to trap yourself to such a limited point of view.

Answer 8

Argument is such a waste of time, I prefer to get alone w/ people if I can.

_()_

Answer 9

There has been no one smart enough to do that yet, so asking in here will get you no where.

Answer 10

Closing my eyes, putting my fingers in my ears, and singing always seems to work for me.