2007-11-09 07:29:55 · 7 answers · asked by carl 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The true God is not imaginairy. He is Being itself.
2007-11-09 07:42:05 · update #1
I couldn't have done it, and not just because I lack the right plumbing.
I try to say yes to God in my life, but only succeed a fraction of the time. I can't imagine what kind of trust and faith her commitment would've taken.
2007-11-09 07:32:25 · answer #1 · answered by Acorn 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Have you never read the story of Leda and the Swan?
A God (Zeus) appears to a mortal woman in the shape of a bird, makes her pregnant and creates a godlike child.
You didn't think that the Christian myth was original, did you?
2007-11-09 07:38:52 · answer #2 · answered by Ranto 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"Krishna replaced into born of the virgin Devaki" no longer in accordance to the Hindu texts (examine Mahabharata Bk 12, XLVIII). "Savior Dionysus replaced into born of the virgin Semele" There are 2 diverse debts of Dionysus being born, neither are a virgin beginning. "Savior Dionysus replaced into born of the virgin Semele" The Buddhist texts do no longer describe a virgin beginning ( The Acts of the Buddha recognizes Maya and Suddhodana as having sexual family members). "The previous Teutonic goddess Hertha replaced right into a virgin impregnated by ability of the heavenly Spirit and bore a son. " source please, i could no longer particularly discover something in this. "Scandinavian Frigga replaced into impregnated by ability of the All-Father Odin and bore Balder, the healer and savior of mankind. " returned, could no longer discover something in this, please furnish a source. @Uncle Wayne- components could be mind-blowing!
2016-12-08 16:56:52 · answer #3 · answered by voll 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who has a baby is producing an incarnation of God.
Everyone and everything is an incarnation of God.
2007-11-09 07:36:14 · answer #4 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
this statement could not be truer, but then again she did it freely, knowing fully well the persecution that would be against her and her child.
2007-11-09 08:03:15 · answer #5 · answered by Perhaps I love you more 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She was an underaged unwed mother who was quite possibly raped, yet you make it sound like she was complicit and knew what she was doing. How can you be so insensitive?
2007-11-09 07:40:37 · answer #6 · answered by Shawn B 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you do know shes not a virgin anymore?
2007-11-09 07:34:18 · answer #7 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋