2007-11-09 03:43:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Software
WinAmp rocks
2007-11-09 03:45:52 · answer #1 · answered by ѕσмєgυy 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think of a exceptional sort of folk who advise itunes have in no way even used winamp so at the instant are not probable able to evaluate. Having used the two fantastically i'm maximum definately a Winamp fan and not an Itunes fan. when I first used itunes i became dismayed to be certain it renaming all my tunes and messing up my submitting device. Winamp only catalogs despite media you have and does not attempt to fasten you into any proprietary format. you may controlled Ipods, and all different Mp3 gamers incredibly with winamp. Winamp is plenty extra versatile and has distinctive cool plug ins. I incredibly like the visualisation ones.
2016-11-10 22:38:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Winamp is better less updates faster search and detail search works great if you can get Winamp pro even better you get to burn at faster speed and much more.
By the way I have both itunes and winamp. I use winamp because is faster and it doesn't use that much RAM as itunes.
hope it helps,
chelo
2007-11-09 03:53:47 · answer #3 · answered by chelo R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Searching features
Winamp wins hands down here, as phrases or individual words can be searched for (even wildcards are supported). iTunes is next best, but it doesn't support phrases. MediaMonkey on the other hand only allows phrase searching which can be very limiting in many circumstances. If you search for two words which are in different field types (such "ELO" in the artist field and "All over the world" in the track title), or even two words in one field which are not a phrase, but where those words still appear at some point, then MediaMonkey won't recognise it (iTunes and Winamp will). Finally, none of the programs under review allow you to exclude certain keywords in the search field (ala Google).
Interface speed
Winamp comes out top in general searching, and scrolling of lists. iTunes can feel slightly sluggish on slower processors (say 1Ghz or less), and MediaMonkey is somewhere in between.
Importing media/MP3s
This is important as you'll need to import many files to begin with, and also as you update the library from time to time. For rescans, MediaMonkey falls behind Winamp and iTunes, as it seems to scan through all the files again. Finally, iTunes hangs when I tried to scan through my massive 40,000 file "Music" folder (it got stuck on a MIDI).
2007-11-09 03:48:42 · answer #4 · answered by Kausik kumaar 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely go with WinAmp, iTunes is very bloated and not very good. WinAmp is still a bit bloated, but is better than iTunes anyway.
2007-11-09 03:47:10 · answer #5 · answered by Yoi_55 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For me if I am running Linux then I prefer Winamp, however if I am using Windows then I will use itunes.
2007-11-09 06:18:42 · answer #6 · answered by Linux Mint 11 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i like itunes better their service is all around better.
2007-11-09 03:46:38 · answer #7 · answered by morgan p 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
iTunes
2007-11-09 03:46:36 · answer #8 · answered by cachetona_1981 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ITUNES!!!!!!! IT IS THE BEST THING EVER!!!!!!!
2007-11-09 03:46:45 · answer #9 · answered by dangc_2010 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋