English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Iran's leader (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) is a tyrant as seen by his actions towards the british troops he had captured and his actions at Columbia University last month.

2. Iran is currently supplying bombs and weapons to terrorist organizations in iraq which the US is not taking kindly to

3. the US has mobilized forces and has started mass producing bunker busters and other such weapons that would be very usfull to defeat a more advanced nation such as Iran. and has stated moving these things closer to Iran.

4. I am not asking wheather or not you would support a war with iran or if you hink it is legitimate. what i am asking. is do you think tthat it will happen. becuase if it does. i gaurantee a draft will happen.

2007-11-08 17:46:35 · 15 answers · asked by corypitzl 1 in Politics & Government Military

15 answers

Prepare yourself for the unthinkable, war againsty Iran may be a necessity.

The UNIMAGINABLE but ultimately inescapable truth is that we are going to have to get ready for war with Iran.

Tehran threatended the US with 'harm and pain' for hauling them before the UN Security Council over its nuclear program. The rapidly intensifying crisis is like a train on a collision course.

While we were chasing phantom nukes in Mesopotamia, next door, Iran was busy building real ones.

The unavoidable reality is that we now need urgently to steel ourselves to the ugly probability that diplomacy will not now suffice, one way or another, unconsciounable acts of war may now be unavoidable.

Those who say war is unthinkable are right. Those who say the US should not send young boys to die in the Middle East far from home are right. Those who say war will foster more violence in the Middle East are right.

Military strikes, even limited, targeted and accurate ones, will have devastating consequences for the region and for the world.

All the argument against a strike are fearfully powerful. But multiplied together, squared, and then cubed, the weight of these arguments do not come close to matching the case for us to stop, by whatever means necessary, Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

If Iran gets safely and unmolested to nuclear status, it will be a threshold moment in the history of the world, up there with the Bolshevik Revolution and the coming of Hitler.

Iran has stated that they will 'wipe Israel off the face of the map." They've stated that the 'holocaust was fake.' And the kind of society we live in and cherish in the West will change beyond recognition if Iran becomes nuclear. We balk now at intrusive government measures to tap our phones or other intrusions into our civil liberties. Imagine how much more our freedoms will be curtailed if our government's fear we are just one telephone call or e-mail, one plane journey or truckload away from another Hiroshima.

2007-11-08 18:57:25 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

I think that the US' response to 9/11 (as well as the events themselves) has created a global secuirty environment which is extremly unpredictable and probably will lead to an invasion of Iran.

But i think it would still be a fair way off, not because anyone has any illusions about Iran's President being a good guy, but because the instability it would cause could destroy the Middle East.

Iraq and Iran used to kind of balance each other out in the Middle East, and since the Iraq War, Iran has been able to grow more powerful in the region. Going to war in Iran before Iraq has a stable government would be far from in Americas best interest (or therest of the world's)

2007-11-08 17:52:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Rockefeller family knows it will happen; which means it has already been pre-planned. Just like they have affirmed it. They knew about the big hit of the World Trade Center, the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq, the fact that we will never find Osama bin Laden, and the ultimate war with Iran.

Are they psychics? No, this seems to be all part of a plan. A plan in which money and power is all the leaders want. Prescott Bush had ties with the Nazi party. Bush Sr. had ties with Saudi Arabia and Iran. Now, our very own Bush cannot find Osama bin Laden, who by the way is listed on the FBI's most wanted list for reasons that do not include the attacks of 9/11.

I hope and pray that the Commander in Chief does not let us down.

2007-11-12 16:02:52 · answer #3 · answered by SICARIUS 4 · 0 0

You are correct in your assumption, all indications points to that direction. The real question is WHEN?

You have to watch out for the placement of tactical military assets and troops build up if this is finally complete then you can count 90 days and we will have a war with Iran.

2007-11-08 17:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by alecs 5 · 1 0

I disagree,
I think there are enough people there... Although they are tired... I believe america can pull troops out and make agreements but choose not too due to the fact that they already pushed troops in and if they were to pull them out they'd basically making them feel as if they're giving up.

Who knows what the hell those countries think?

2007-11-08 17:53:54 · answer #5 · answered by rum_rum408 1 · 0 0

After everything Irans are doing the USA Army will go to war with them (I think).

2007-11-08 17:50:07 · answer #6 · answered by gamerman 2 · 0 0

If more Americans are obliged to die so money can be made by an elite class that largely keeps its own propagation out of
harms way; then, yes, more of the non-gentry must die.

2007-11-12 17:29:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YEAH!! efw I agree with you and take your side.
If it happens it happens they have been warned. But not only Isreal and the US of A but a few more countries will be there at the same time.

2007-11-12 17:29:09 · answer #8 · answered by Crystal D 1 · 0 0

After Iran, I hear California is next

2007-11-08 17:51:26 · answer #9 · answered by ChicagoMan 3 · 3 1

US will invade Iran if the latter continue to develop its nuclear arms.

2007-11-08 20:24:18 · answer #10 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers