alrite. I base my logic on the "a priori" false.
just as there is no such thing as a married bachelor,
an opaque object that is transparent,
and things that are by definition false,
I can disprove the existence of the FSM.
1.) spaghetti is made of starch
2.) starch is a molecule
3.) molecules consist of matter
4.) matter is bound by the laws of physics
5.) the law of conservation of energy must be bent in order for the universe to be created
6.) seeing as how starch molecules cannot defy the laws of physics
7.) thus, the existence of the FSM that created the universe is thus disproven.
2007-11-08 16:24:53 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
egghead charlie.
perhaps you need to learn some logic.
something cannot consist of matter but defy the laws of physics. the two conflict with each other. it can only be one or the other. all you have proven is that you are as eggheaded as your name suggests.
2007-11-08 16:31:52 · update #1
Egghead charlie. My definition of God is not conformed to your rediculous interpretation of a creator as a "sky fairy". Ever heard of something called a straw man fallacy?
2007-11-09 19:01:55 · update #2
so what's your question? I know he is real, I saw him at Mardi Gras
2007-11-08 16:31:38 · answer #1 · answered by going postal 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
the important aspect of spaghetti is wheat, spaghetti does no longer obviously ensue everywhere contained in the universe, is man made merchandise created solely through the movements of guy. obviously for this reason guy is incapable of manufacture any merchandise from plant cloth able to the feats your have special. obviously your Flying spaghetti monster won't be able to exist. i'm satisfied i can conclusively answer your question.
2016-10-23 21:56:05 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I heard on CNN about an hour ago that the FSM had developed engine trouble and had crash landed through the roof of the white house where all the politicians were gathered and they proceeded to devour him for mid-afternoon snacks. I suppose the old adage is true; "What you eat today, walks and talks tomorrow"
2007-11-08 17:08:24 · answer #3 · answered by mandbturner3699 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh, that's easy! The Flying Spaghetti Monster always existed. If it works for Ol' Jehova, surely it can work for the FSM, as well. What's sauce for the goose, and all that...
2007-11-08 16:31:48 · answer #4 · answered by nobody important 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
wtg on wasting your time. The FSM was an admitted non-existent being from the very beginning.
The creator of the FSM beat you to it.
pwned again.
2007-11-08 16:29:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, but the FSM exists outside space and time.
So there.
2007-11-08 16:39:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Spaghetti is merely a figurative interpretation of his most noodliness.
Your logic is therefore flawed at the outset.. (and you have too much time on your hands... lol).
2007-11-08 16:36:41 · answer #7 · answered by Icy Gazpacho 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Obviously it's a "flying" spaghetti monster and it's made of freaking spaghetti, which implies its magical, meaning the laws of science don't apply, sort of like your god; so back to the drawing board genius. lol
edit- oh I see, you believe in a magical sky fairy and you're trying to lecture me on logic, LMAO!
2007-11-08 16:29:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
You mock what you don't understand!
Besides, there's a video of His Noodly Appendage in Germany.
RAmen.
2007-11-08 16:32:02 · answer #9 · answered by Quonx. 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't care what evidence you provide!
My faith will always be strong and saucy!
2007-11-08 16:31:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋