http://chiwowwow.biz/blog/images/_wallpaper_images_girl_girl_angelina_jolie020.jpg
i know shes pale faced, have they used spots or photoshop to flair the highlights.
the right sleeve seems a bit more burnt is that lighting or PS?
i think the image is strong, did the photographer choose to flair the lite?? what you think?? i like it but dont like it - is that possible?
as you can see im cluless so please any input would be great....thanks
2007-11-08 16:05:40 · 5 answers · asked by Antoni 7 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
perky you have sumed it up for me, many thanks
lidy and dude, thank godness other people and perky see this the same as me, i see so many blown highlight shots and dont get why they do it? fotog mess up or post - or does one of them think it looks good?
2007-11-08 22:16:58 · update #1
edit: perky another person calls it post production, i like that i thought i was alone hear.....
2007-11-08 22:17:59 · update #2
Reading her pupils, it appears that they used only one light fairly close to the ground, then used the seamless paper as a reflector. I think the picture suffers from too much contrast, which might be the photographers fault or could be someone else responsible for post production. But the harsh contrast blows out the highlights. (I tested this by Photoshopping one of my own images and got similar results)
The pose is quite nice, so yes, you could find it and the subject pleasing but be put off by the effect.
2007-11-08 21:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by Perki88 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The image looks worked on in a photo editing program.
If so, the hilites were blown and the colors were saturated.
If not, the lighting from above was too strong and perhaps there was just too much lighting. It needs more contrast by less lighting and softer, more natural lighting.
Too fake for me.
2007-11-09 00:38:17 · answer #2 · answered by dude 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like the image. It doesn't matter that her body is all tangled up and her foot looks very long in that photo, or that she's sitting on a cloud. Her face takes over the whole shot in my opinion. I like the lighting, especially on her face. She has great eyes and lips, and I think most people would be drawn to that.
2007-11-09 12:01:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lots an lots of digital editing, I love the creative way it's been cropped.
2007-11-09 02:21:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It looks over-processed to me - almost cartoonish. Monte Zucker would be appalled IMO.
2007-11-09 07:35:12 · answer #5 · answered by EDWIN 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋