Amnesty Int has come out on the side of abortion on demand?

Question

Amnesty claim that women in certain countries are being denied access to certain health care services - especially abortion clinics.
Do the unborn have no rights? As a moral question, I am insensed at Amenisty, should I be? shouldn't you be? I will never understand the violence done to women or indeed against any form of life in our society, including abortion, what say you as a christian?
P.s Reseach this yourself and yes this is an appropriate forum

Answer 1

How do they balance the right to life of unborn girls (and boys) against the right of a woman to destroy that life for whatever reason (including the fact that the child is and would be an inconvenience to the "mother") and conclude that the right to destroy that life is more important than the right to life the unborn should enjoy?
Amnesty Intl. is now Murder Intl.
They will never get a dime more out of me.

And enough with the examples of rape and incest. The abortions done because of these acts are extremely rare while abortions for convenience are much more common.

Answer 2

Reagan granted amnesty to a million.7 million unlawful Mexican immigrants returned interior the eighty's...2 many years late we've 12+ million waiting for amnesty. i will only think of if we furnish amnesty returned, we furnish extra of an incentive for Mexicans to bypass the border illegally. In 20 extra years we will have 20+ million waiting... while there at the instant are not any outcomes for coming right here illegally and a vast income for staying on the down-low till you get a President to furnish amnesty, then it incredibly is our dropping conflict. the two we enforce the regulations or take them off of the books...this returned-and-forth costs too rattling plenty. Edit: a million/2: "Yeah, like the poster suggested earlier, Reagan made a important mistake, even he admitted to it. yet, he became lied to touching directly to the numbers." In 1986, Reagan signed an immigration reform invoice that legalized the prestige for a million.7-million human beings. I earlier wrote a million.3 by using twist of destiny.

Answer 3

"abortion on demand"

When you try to frame things one way, there is no reason to believe anything else you say.

The unborn have rights proxied by the mother.

No, you should be thankful that something like amnesty international exists. Who the hell else could have done the job they do?

No, I shouldn't be. Same reason as above.

As a not-christian, I say that violence against women is wrong. I also say that amnesty international has done a helluva lot against violence towards women.

I don't think abortion is morally wrong.

Answer 4

The unborn have no rights, that is true. The violence that you speak of is true, also, in that it's terrible to end a life rather than avoid creating it. It would be far, far preferable to provide contraceptives and condoms to everyone on the planet than to have to resort to abortion on demand to curb the current growth rate of the human population.

Don't you think it makes more sense to encourage men to insist on using condoms, in order to prevent this violence? That makes much better sense than triggering huge wars over resources due to overpopulation, which is even more violent than abortion on demand.

Answer 5

I am 13. I am jewish. I am female. Only an unconsiderate man could think this way. My friend was raped. The rapist got her pregnant. She should have the right to an abortion. She goes to a shrink every day. She way beaten and her female organs were hurt. 13 is too young to be pregnant. This is what abortions are meant for. Helping young girls or women who are in trouble, raped, or poor, or sick and can't take care of the baby or having the baby would kill them. My friend had an abortion. Having a baby at 13 is life threatning and should she not have a right to a normal rest of her childjood without a child of her own. I should think so. If she had had that baby she could have died and would have been able to live with the child of her rapist. Would you. This is what abortion is for. YOu are wrong.

Answer 6

Amnesty International is an organization which repeatedly criticizes the free nations of the world for various alleged abuses. However, they are strangely silent when the despots of the world commit crimes against humanity.

Answer 7

God HATES hands that shed innocent blood. And what is more innocent than an unborn child?




Pro 6:16 ¶ These six [things] doth the LORD hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him:


Pro 6:17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,


Pro 6:18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,


Pro 6:19 A false witness [that] speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.

Answer 8

So what? Have you seen a woman dying of too many births, or looking like an old woman at 30, exhausted by too many children she cannot feed. They are not allowed to refuse their husband, they have no access to birth control.
But after they are only walking wombs, it is their duty to have children until they die of it... isn't it what you're saying. THEIR life have no value.

And it is "including birth control."

Answer 9

No, the "unborn" do not have rights. A fetus is inhabiting a woman's body, no one is allowed to take advantage of someone else's body like that without their consent.

Answer 10

Yet another reason I am a member of Amnesty International.

You're not very good at twisting words. Practice, practice, practice.