Please explain the explosions popping out of the Twin Towers on 9/11?

Question

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth911/truth911/towers.htm

Molten Metal on 9/11 - impossible to create from an air fire! :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JithuVAIb7Y

Controlled demolitions of 3 WTC buildings:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY

Building 7 was not hit by any plane or seriously damaged:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ9BofDUXv0
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2073592843640256739

Flight 93 - where is the wreckage and debris? :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s&NR=1

Pentagon - where is the 80 tonnes of jet plane debris? :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rgyq2H7PpO0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSeaZLYViwU

"9/11 Mysteries" - detailed scientific analysis of what happened on 9/11:

Part 1:
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-8452331984890658202&hl=en

Part 2:
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=1018616329475082196&hl=en

Part 3:
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=6024263701753064760&hl=en

http://truth911.net

Answer 1

Here are some anwers to your questions

EXPLOSIONS

There were no "explosions" when the towers collapsed.

There were puffs of air that came out of the Towers as they collapsed

These puffs of air have no significance since they are seen all the time in demolitions and therefore they mean nothing.

Structural Engineer Jon Magnussen says it is fairly common phenomenon in building collapses. “You could actually have a collapse starting at the top of the building, and the air could come out of the bottom, going down the elevator shafts. It finds the path of least resistance.” (Pop Mechanics, “Debunking” p.45)

MELTED METAL

It’s unclear if the clean-up crews found molten metal. But even if they did, it was probably melted aluminum.

However, there is definitely no reliable source that says molten STEEL was found. For example:

QUOTE “NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft”

From Point 11 in
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm


QUOTE “In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires. The melting point of steel is about 1,500 degrees Celsius”

From Point 7 in
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

In addition, photographs of supposed melted metal were shown to Emertius Professor of Metallurgic Engineering at Lehigh University, Alan Pense, who says, “The photographs shown to support melting steel are, to me, unconvincing…or show materials that appear to be other than steel. One of the photos appears to me to be mostly of glass with unmelted steel rods in it.” (Pop Mech book, p 41). Many other experts say the same thing.

COLLAPSE OF WTC7

The fact that WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn’t hit by the planes is not surprising.

Even though they were NOT hit by the jets, numerous buildings over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers and were destroyed.

This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_attack#Damage

DEBRIS OF FLIGHT 93

Debris was definitely found, the largest piece being an engine fan.

NOT A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION

To the untrained eye the collapse of the WTC buildings may look like a controlled demolition, but essentially all demolition experts say the collapse didn’t look like a demolition. They don’t work for gov’t. Here’s an article from the world-renowned journal, Implosion World that destroys the “controlled demolition theory” :

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

Mark Loizeaux of “Controlled Demolition,” a company holding world records in controlled demolitions, says it was not a controlled demolition. Among other things, he says, “the explosives configuration manufacturing technology [to bring down those buildings] does not exist” (Debunking 9/11 Myths, p.46) This means the sheer weight & volume of the explosives to do a demolition like this would be noticed.

Answer 2

Those videos are complete B.S. The windows that were being blown out is caused by air. When you have a building with the windows completely sealed up, and those buildings come crashing down all that air has to go some where. It's like a sode bottle. You take a soda bottle and shake it up, then open the lid, all that pressure is being released at the same time. Same thing with the towers. Oh and the thing about Pennsylvania and the Pentagon is full of ****. Take into consideration that when flight 93 plowed into the ground, it was in a 45 degree nose dive. At that angle the aircraft will go into what is called a stall. That is when the engines cannot keep up with speeds that the aircraft is traveling. Flight 93 was a Boeing 757 its average cruise speed is 530 mph. In a stall the aircraft is traveling faster, much faster. Upon impact pieces of that aircraft were buried. All that conspiracy bull crap is exactly that, B.S. You need to stop believing everything you see on tv and the internet and research this crap yourself.

Answer 3

These sources don't cover the whole story. Steel will not melt, it will lose its tensive strengh and become unable to support the weight of the building.
As far as the wreckage of the Aircraft is concerned, in most crashes the pilot dumps his fuel and makes every attempt to bring the Aircraft down intact. On 9-11 the muslims flying those planes didn't dump the fuel and had no thourght of landing the craft safely.
You really should read the popular mechanics story.

Answer 4

Tall skyscrapers are mostly empty space. If you squeeze empty space quickly it creates big air pressure that can blow out windows, walls...etc. Take a empty box or paper back and pop it between your two hands. See what happens. I see blow outs in those photos. But do you see any flashes? I didn't see any flashes you usually see during normal demolition that sweep entire building before collapse. And when you demolish building you'll see sweeping explosion and then collapse. Not explosions and collapse at same time. So that tells us that it is building collapse that is causing build up of air pressure that blow out windows and walls. Not explosions. HINT: you don't think it's weird entire building is wired up for demolition and when a commercial airliner crash into it non of hundreds of explosives goes off? Non of these goes off during fire that spread throughout several floors? Once you create big air pressure wind it doesn't stop after one floor. When you blow to blow out candle do have to right up against the fire? No, you can be good 1 foot away and blow the candle light out. Air can travel pretty far. Compressing air have to go somewhere. It'll find a way to get out of building. This air compression don't just disappear.

Answer 5

http://www.youtube.com/RKOwens4

If you forgotten about how horrible 9/11, this tribute should remind you. Don’t forget about 9/11. These conspiracy theorists seem don’t care and use this disaster as an excuse to expand there paranoia to others......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv4s3fn8jDc

Answer 6

How do you think steel is made? It's in a molten state before its shaped. The amount of explosive needed to make that "popping" noise? It takes thousands of pounds. Do you think anyone in the building would notice a few people taking days to plant explosives? Don't believe anything in your hyperlinks.

Answer 7

Why don't you look at the Popular Mechanics articles and book on the subject?

Please stop all of this conspiracy nonsense! Speculation is not fact.

You need to get off the Net and out of your parents' basement.

BTW. Over pressure within inside the towers, due to the falling floors above, would blow out the windows.

Answer 8

To answer this question,visit:

http://www.seeloosechange.com

The molten metal cannot be aluminium (melting point 580
to 650 C). Last I remember, they make frying pans out of
aluminium! And these don't melt when exposed to air fires!

Answer 9

Easy 2 points...thanks!

Answer 10

All of those sources are complete BS.