English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm looking for a viable plan. A link to a site that has this plan would be a great help as well.

2007-11-08 10:17:01 · 20 answers · asked by baseboll14 2 in Politics & Government Immigration

20 answers

The best first step would be to hit employers of illegals hard (confiscatory fines, jail time), and cut off all public services to illegals. This would get many to leave on thier own, and discourage more from coming. It would then be more pheasible to round the remainder up.

2007-11-08 10:31:37 · answer #1 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 5 1

Janet Reno was the "hammer". Moving that many people, many who were lured here would take a while. That said each country could accept them in time. You cannot just zip million out to another place without making sure they willl be taken care of. Dump a milliion people in an area and what do they eat? Not sure of a site, ubt the others have the right idea, tag the employers, make them pay the 1099 tax or whatever. If done will stop flow coming to want amnesty. Also don't forget about the millions that flew here on a visa nad never left. Go figure. I wonder what got eaveryone so fired up about this now? Been going on since Moby was a minnow.

2007-11-08 11:01:02 · answer #2 · answered by R J 7 · 1 0

a change will ensue, notwithstanding it will be through economy and not in any respect the authorities. comprehend this, the authorities will not in any respect do the right element. the effect of Bush 8 3 hundred and sixty 5 days reign besides as foreclosure, out sourcing and organic failures have over whelmed us economically. Jobs for unlawful turns into no longer a threat to get, and many will flow living house. 1000's of thousands have despatched money again living house and extra of their economic organization account than the overall American. no longer all will flow again; purely those who've a clarification for doing so. Even human beings flow from city to city or state to state to stumble on a good interest. also, i think that particular States will crack down like not in any respect. What D.C received't do, the guy State will do. Mississippi has already all started the technique. This State has a lot less illegals than the different.

2016-10-23 21:27:54 · answer #3 · answered by kristey 4 · 0 0

We do not need to deport anyone. We need to deny them jobs, housing, health care, schooling, and other necessities of life. They will then leave the way they came.

Anyone found to employ an illegal would have his business or farm taken away and given to someone else.

Anyone found to rent to an illegal would have the house taken away and given to someone else.

This plan is called tough love. Any judge opposing these rules would be removed from office by the people. By force if necessary.

2007-11-08 14:02:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The general plan is called Attritian. Stop their work opportunities. Give law enforcement the opportunity to work with ICE and other agencies to weed out those here illegally as well as those here criminally in their actions ...fraud, stealing ID etc. etc. and make it clear publicaly that America is mad as Heck and we aren't going to take it anymore.

With those simple, (and I do believe they are simple things), many of these illegally here folks would get the message, see no further hope here ...and leave by themselves. give em' a chance to sell their huge trucks (bought on time) and other goodies, pocket the cash and let em go. They will see the opportunity and flee as best the can. Then they can work on coming here legally.

The rest would be picked up on traffic tickets and other crime related reviews by police.
Turning people in might have a little bit better effect than the way it is currently but would be a greater instiller of fear in those who should not be here, than it will be in effect.

Checking children at schools would be helpful and would direct focus on many illegals. Actually putting people in jail for false ID (as would be done to a US citizen if caught doing so) would speed the process a bit as well. End anchor baby approach. See the 14th Amen. for what it was intended.

It will take time in any event. This problem didn't happen overnight. 5 to 10 years and it will be done as needed. The majority of exodus would occur within 3 years.
That's my best guess.

2007-11-08 10:59:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Start by prosecuting every company that hires, harbors or helps illegals. Then ensure that the churches understand that sanctuary will no longer be granted to those who assist lawbreakers and that their tax exempt status will be revoked. Require employers to check every identification of every employee and have the IRS and Social Security cross check identities. As soon as an illegal immigrant is discovered, that illegal immigrant should face monumental prosecution and should be given a choice, go back where you came from voluntarily or go to jail and have all your assets seized. After the illegal serves his/her sentence, they will be forcibly removed from the USA and if they are caught in the USA again, they will be executed. That means they should all be fingerprinted and have other forms of bioidentification so they can't falsify identifications (or at least it will be much more difficult. We need to hire many more border patrol and homeland security agents and we need to extend enforcement to enforcement against foreign owned businesses. We start with 100 or 10 or 20 and do this daily. Once it is proven that we are seriously going to enforce our laws, there will be a mass exodus out of the country and more will be smuggled out of the USA than in. Why smuggle them out? Prosecution and loss of assets.

2007-11-08 11:07:07 · answer #6 · answered by Mindbender 4 · 3 2

Law enforcement needs to stop ignoring the problem. Drivers' licenses shouldn't be given to people who don't have their papers, and if they get pulled over with no license, their car should be impounded and they should be taken to the station, so they can be identified, and then the law should be enforced from there. If I got caught driving without a license, that's what would happen to me...why should it be any different just because it requires more work? I think it's idiotic that people say local law enforcement says that it's a federal problem, so they shouldn't have anything to do about it. If a US citizen abducted a child and crossed state lines, would local law enforcement say it's a federal problem? The law should be enforced equally to all people.

2007-11-08 11:12:08 · answer #7 · answered by Frau eines Zwillings 2 · 2 1

First, complete the wall, and add to the border patrol personnel.
Second, make it impossible for illegals to be able to get any sort of government benefits (food stamps, welfare, housing assistance, etc.)
Third, make it a federal crime to hire or assist illegals in any way (OH YEAH!!! That's ALREADY the law!)
Make it as tough as possible for the illegals to be able to stay here and they will start heading for the borders. Look at OK and KY, the perfect test. It saves the US the cash that it would cost to transport them home, as well as the manpower to do so.

2007-11-08 12:12:47 · answer #8 · answered by Lev8mysoul 6 · 2 1

I am not for a mass deportation, but I think if we fine and jail those that hire the illegals, being most say they are only here to work, and if there was no work, they would self deport.

2007-11-08 10:32:41 · answer #9 · answered by jean 7 · 3 1

Attrition through enforcement.
Look at the reports coming out of Oklahoma. Illegals started a mass exodus before the new laws took effect.

If you eliminate the magnets that bring them here they won't come and if you eliminate all the social programs that keep them here, they will leave on their own accord.
No more free schooling, no more free medical. .
No more perverting the 14th amendment and it's citizenship clause. No more drivers licenses, sanctuary cities, etc. Nothing..or if you prefer NADA.

Do that and the problem goes away.

2007-11-08 10:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers