Did Satan change the age of the earth from 6,000 years to make it look like 4.5 billion years?

Answer 1

No! Evolutionists did! They are the spawn of the Devil!

I shouldn't have eaten them little brown mushrooms, should I?

Answer 2

I don't know ... but I do know this - upon 9 years examination, and via an appropriate background in science:


I'm glad you brought this topic up, also, because it allows me to call upon your response to the work I recently published via Xulon Press.com, “TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!!” [by Denis Towers], which, my experience has been, during its brief and limited exposure so far, has proven a powerful faith-promoter.
It actually illustrates, following a 9 year research into the fact – one Heavenly-inspired [I believe] – a discovery I made 10 years ago, being a long-time specialist in Kinesiology and applied anatomy, that the typical ground snake presents as the precise antithesis of Man in ALL aspects, both – anatomically-functionally and psycho-behaviorally.
For many, this has proven quite an eerie finding!
But once one has recovered from the sheer gravitating shock of this perfectly central, yet simple, discovery, it is usually immediately realized that only a true and absolute brilliant Master mind could possibly have engineered such – that such an outcome could only be the result of meaningful deliberation and conscious decision, and, therefore, that “random mutation” [per the belief of ‘evolutionary theory’] certainly wasn't 'random", if at all!!
Overall, it has proven a highly intriguing, most fascinating and enormously revelatory study.
Of course, this finding not only tends to disprove 'evolution', but it also Powerfully supports the Biblical Adam and Eve account, wherein it was the very serpent – through whom Satan (a spirit only) was able to speak to Adam and Eve in the natural world – that same serpent which first set Man in opposition to God; and it was the serpent, therefore, that God chose to “curse above all the beasts of the field” [per description in holy writ] for its trouble.
As indicated, as 'fruits of its labor', God cursed the serpent 'above all the beasts of the field' ... hence making significant changes to it (a passing few recorded in scripture).
What this study appears to show is that those changes made were so as to symbolize or represent this very act of opposition of the snake as described – an act which effectively became the most transcendent single decision and most significant event among ALL events in the entire history and progress of Man, barring the All and Most important of all – that of redemption from this very event – the Atonement of Christ Himself.
Meantime, as stated, it seems that the Creator has temporarily signified, in effect, the serpent’s complete opposition to Man and God [in whose image we were created] … so that, in typical life-ironic fashion, what has tended to be the most unbelievable account concerning Man in the entire holy record: that which claims that a snake spoke to a man (all the more so since today the creature cannot even vocalize) – has become the very one that we have most scientifically proven took place (or supported)!!!!!
… but isn’t this, though, just so typical of the genuine ironies of real life?!

It has, indeed, become a most intriguing, diabolical world since the snake expressed its opposition to Man and God.
It has, likewise, been a most encompassing, intriguing and faith-promoting study to undertake.
From the reader’s viewpoint, I have known people so inspired by the work as to read it twice in the first week or so that they had accessed it.

I personally invite you to search it for yourself, and inform me of your experience.
Thank you very much.

Source(s)
Two Birds ... One Stone!!
by Denis Towers
published Xulonpress.com 2007

GOOD LUCK AND MAY GOD BLESS YOUR GENUINE SEARCH, AS HE DID MINE.
‘SEEK AND YE SHALL FIND, KNOCK AND IT SHALL BE OPENED UNTO YOU…”

Answer 3

No, the Young Earth argument for the dating of different objects is due to Noah's Flood. The idea is that having excessive amount of water over the entire earth would have caused the different fossils to have deteriorated faster than normal, and some at different speeds than others.

Answer 4

the earth is very old


according to bible it was created in the beginning


it says that creatures and grass and stuff came later


last of all, man and woman


bible is not a science text book, but where it touches on science it is spot on

Answer 5

No. Man just changes things to fit into his own ideas. Man reads scripture much to literal.

Answer 6

no the Earth was REmade after war with Lucipher.

Answer 7

No. Science did.

Answer 8

Yeah! He used Shake-n-Bake ! And, I helped.

Answer 9

No Ymir's remains really are that old.

Answer 10

no, science did.