English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Theories about life? What role does religion play the in those beliefs? Primary agricultural exports, etc. Thanks.

2007-11-08 09:03:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

I'm more of a Montenegrist, a bit Bosnianist, but by no means a Serbianist, let alone a Croatianist!!!!!


We don't need no stinkin' Croatianists!!!!

2007-11-08 09:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by Lex Fok B.M.F. 3 · 3 1

I definitely have taken diverse anthropology training, and understand the concept of evolution completely. although, I additionally think of that nature is only too appropriate and too pleasing that all of it 'only taking place' is only too unbelievable. So, i assume i could fall decrease than 'clever layout', yet no longer interior the way that maximum folk think of of it now (ie, human beings attempting to get creationism taught in faculties) yet interior the literal experience, which ability we've been someway created by making use of a extra robust ability, and evolution, if it grew to become into the case (it does have its holes, yet so do all theories to describe how we've been given right here) could have been directed by making use of this greater ability particularly than being thoroughly random genetic mutations. so some distance as Noah's Ark, i do no longer likely understand - no longer less than, i've got not got faith a wood boat could desire to've survived 4000 years uncovered on impressive of a mountain. incredibly much each and every custom in life has some variety of flood tale (alongside with a introduction tale and a narrative of a deity being resurrected), which seems to show that faster or later in very distant historic previous, there grew to become right into a flood that only approximately thoroughly lined the aspects of the earth familiar to people on the time.

2017-01-06 08:13:10 · answer #2 · answered by luby 4 · 0 0

Dr C presents the standard creationist arguement #1 against evolution, "It is too complicated for me to understand, therefore God did it." I have explained DNA to them many times & pointed out the fact that human chromosome #2 is but a fusion of 2 chimp chromosomes, to no avail.
If genetic biologists had the proper tools & information on what many of these "switches" in genomes we are researching do, we could build a human from the genome of a chimp by making a few minor changes. We are rapidly approaching the point where we can engineer animals & should accomplish this in less than 50 yrs.
Chuckle... the misspelling got a lot of attention.

2007-11-08 10:01:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

If you want: How does religion explain the economic and social situations of today, you could read my 100 page book of 1993 publication "Australia Imploded!"

However, if you want real science that proves Biblical early accounts try this:


I'm glad you brought this topic up, also, because it allows me to call upon your response to the work I recently published via Xulon Press.com, “TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!!” [by Denis Towers], which, my experience has been, during its brief and limited exposure so far, has proven a powerful faith-promoter.
It actually illustrates, following a 9 year research into the fact – one Heavenly-inspired [I believe] – a discovery I made 10 years ago, being a long-time specialist in Kinesiology and applied anatomy, that the typical ground snake presents as the precise antithesis of Man in ALL aspects, both – anatomically-functionally and psycho-behaviorally.
For many, this has proven quite an eerie finding!
But once one has recovered from the sheer gravitating shock of this perfectly central, yet simple, discovery, it is usually immediately realized that only a true and absolute brilliant Master mind could possibly have engineered such – that such an outcome could only be the result of meaningful deliberation and conscious decision, and, therefore, that “random mutation” [per the belief of ‘evolutionary theory’] certainly wasn't 'random", if at all!!
Overall, it has proven a highly intriguing, most fascinating and enormously revelatory study.
Of course, this finding not only tends to disprove 'evolution', but it also Powerfully supports the Biblical Adam and Eve account, wherein it was the very serpent – through whom Satan (a spirit only) was able to speak to Adam and Eve in the natural world – that same serpent which first set Man in opposition to God; and it was the serpent, therefore, that God chose to “curse above all the beasts of the field” [per description in holy writ] for its trouble.
As indicated, as 'fruits of its labor', God cursed the serpent 'above all the beasts of the field' ... hence making significant changes to it (a passing few recorded in scripture).
What this study appears to show is that those changes made were so as to symbolize or represent this very act of opposition of the snake as described – an act which effectively became the most transcendent single decision and most significant event among ALL events in the entire history and progress of Man, barring the All and Most important of all – that of redemption from this very event – the Atonement of Christ Himself.
Meantime, as stated, it seems that the Creator has temporarily signified, in effect, the serpent’s complete opposition to Man and God [in whose image we were created] … so that, in typical life-ironic fashion, what has tended to be the most unbelievable account concerning Man in the entire holy record: that which claims that a snake spoke to a man (all the more so since today the creature cannot even vocalize) – has become the very one that we have most scientifically proven took place (or supported)!!!!!
… but isn’t this, though, just so typical of the genuine ironies of real life?!

It has, indeed, become a most intriguing, diabolical world since the snake expressed its opposition to Man and God.
It has, likewise, been a most encompassing, intriguing and faith-promoting study to undertake.
From the reader’s viewpoint, I have known people so inspired by the work as to read it twice in the first week or so that they had accessed it.

I personally invite you to search it for yourself, and inform me of your experience.
Thank you very much.

Source(s)
Two Birds ... One Stone!!
by Denis Towers
published Xulonpress.com 2007

GOOD LUCK AND MAY GOD BLESS YOUR GENUINE SEARCH, AS HE DID MINE.
‘SEEK AND YE SHALL FIND, KNOCK AND IT SHALL BE OPENED UNTO YOU…”

2007-11-08 09:22:14 · answer #4 · answered by dr c 4 · 0 1

Reminds me of a joke about Swiss watches being called swatches.
If Croatia made a watch, what time would it be? Just a minute let me check my____________.
It was funnier when the comedian told it, I swear!!

2007-11-08 09:19:32 · answer #5 · answered by absent farmer 6 · 3 0

Well I would be abit more of a Serbianist...a bit of a Montenegroist and amacidonianst defnlty not a croationist...

2007-11-08 12:08:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I don't think the croationists know what they believe, they are pretty diverse...

Hey popey! Why haven't you added me back yet? Does my breath smell or something?

2007-11-08 09:07:58 · answer #7 · answered by Princess Ninja 7 · 4 0

Christian always have chicken first, then the eggs.
I am not from Croatia!!

2007-11-08 09:08:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

it was named nat'l geographics best tourist destination last year. can you believe it beat tempe az.?

2007-11-08 09:15:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

I'm not from Croatia

2007-11-08 09:07:08 · answer #10 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers