Hopefully those who respond will know a little about how Iraq came to be.
2007-11-08 08:44:45 · 5 answers · asked by Xavier 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
i think, in any case, it's not our decision whatsoever.
true democracy mandates that the individual express their own interests. an occupying, ignorant, imperialist power should be the least voice of influence.
2007-11-08 10:05:36 · answer #1 · answered by leftypower 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the next President, or even this President, I wish, although its unrealistic since he is stubborn, would appoint another bi-partisan comission, like the Iraq Study Group, to basically analyze where we are in Iraq and what the best solution is. And actually listen to the comission, because we had a few the last few years but Pres. Bush hasn't listened to them. I think the Three-State solution is a good potential idea.
2007-11-08 16:50:45 · answer #2 · answered by Super Tuesday 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that is the only way to secure a long term peace, the country was put together by the French and British after WWI with no thought about how the three groups of people hate each other as much as they do.
2007-11-08 16:53:21 · answer #3 · answered by C-Town Dawgs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes sense. "Iraq" was three states until the British fused it into "Iraq" in the early 1920s. There was the Kingdom of Mosul, the Kingdom of Babylon and the Kingdom of Basra.
2007-11-08 18:47:07 · answer #4 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think long term we would see more problems in the region with each ethnic group moving to live in their individual ethnic state . . . We are seeing the beginnings with Turkey and will see it for sure with Saudi Arabia and Iran.
2007-11-08 16:48:32 · answer #5 · answered by CHARITY G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋