Technically that would be walking on gel.
If he walked on gel, could he turn gel into jello-shots?
2007-11-08 06:14:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by STFU Dude 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
or what if he was walking on a board that was painted to look invisible in water and he was walking on that?
I saw it done at Marine World. The guy said he could walk on water, but I saw the board. I was so disillusioned.
of course, I was only 5 at the time..... I was gently discouraged by my mother from pointing this out in a very loud and indignant voice to the crowd.
2007-11-08 10:01:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lady Morgana 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Criss Angel walked on water. Perhaps Jesus was an illusionist?
2007-11-08 06:17:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by pumpkinhead 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
because if you read the whole of the context you will see that peter got out of the boat and walked on the water also until he took his eyeas of jesus which is when he sank into the water
2007-11-08 06:15:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats just it, the bible is NOT open to inerpertation, it was interpreted when it was written, rememeber the church was here already teaching the truths of the bible, not the other way around.
2007-11-08 06:48:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I always assumed he just knew where the rocks were.
2007-11-08 06:19:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Everything in the Bible is not up to personal interpretation.
2007-11-08 06:14:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by alexandersmommy 5
·
0⤊
5⤋
Doesn't work; I tried it. Jesus wasn't gellin'.
.
2007-11-08 06:14:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stranger In The Night 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
because you are gellin like Magellan.
Jesus doesn't rhyme with gellin
2007-11-08 06:15:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
it is not open for interpretation it is only the liberal so-called "Christians" who claim this. the Bible is the inspired word of God and should be taken literally.
2007-11-08 06:14:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Saved by Grace 3
·
0⤊
6⤋