do u think the undertaker (wrestler) can defeat mike tyson in his prime?(?

Answer 1

No.

Because wrestling is fake...fake...fake.

And Mike Tyson is insane...insane...insane..criminally insane.

Answer 2

I don't think.... I know that the Undertaker can't defeat Mike Tyson in a boxing match. Tyson is a trained professional fighter and the Undertaker is not. The Undertaker would be on a survival mission just to last the first two minutes of the fight.

Answer 3

I usually hate questions like that one with the aid of fact they're 2 completely diverse video games. One is actual struggling with and the different is Staged. that is real that no many times happening guy on the streets ought to do what Undertaker and Khali ought to do. nonetheless, that isn't any longer even actual Wrestling. If the two have been actual wrestlers, then it would remember on the guidelines. Are they employing gloves? If no longer, than Mike Tyson is at a disadvantage. in the event that they're, they the combat ought to no longer final long in any respect. At that element, it would remember on in spite of if or no longer Tyson has ANY style of know-how of wresling. If he would not then he's in vast complication. If he has the capability, which i think of he does, to do staple products, like ruin a carry long sufficient to throw some punches, then he wins. you may understand that grappling is one in all the main useful style of struggling with. It would not advise that a boxer or martial artist could no longer beat a grappler. yet grappling includes slightly each and every and greater. Wrestling, if achieved precise, is closer to grappling than boxing is. If a sturdy wrestler can take a punch even marginally nicely, he could have the skill to defeat a sturdy boxer. hence, i might guess that, if the two of those adult males have been actual wrestlers, they might not have lots of an part with the aid of fact although they're better than Mike, they're VERY slow. Mike might KO the two with the aid of fact he might have the skill to a minimum of ruin a undemanding carry. If he have been struggling with between the others, Steve Austin, The Rock, John Cena, adult males with slightly greater athletic skill, and in the event that they understand actual Wrestling, then Mike may be in complication.

Answer 4

may I ask you also, in what game or sport? Wrestling or boxing... well if in boxing undertaker can't realy defeat mike tyson since he used to live in the world of wrestling. other way around, as well as to mike tyson. but if you will leave them in an ordinary fight, still mike tyson will win.... because the only thing undertaker know is to memorize all the moves in wrestling since it is just a fantasy show... they were actors there not really a fighters....

Answer 5

No. Taker is not a trained fighter. Tyson in his prime was a former Undisputed World champion, and one of the most fearsome fighting machines, probably ever (this, of course, was before Buster Douglas and Evander Holyfield shattered that illusion forever). Tyson would destroy Taker in the first 60 seconds.

However, in a worked (Pro Wrestling) scenario, Taker would take some heavy-looking (but pulled) Tyson shots, make the big comeback, Chokeslam and Tonbstone Mr. Tyson, and pin him.

Answer 6

Thats like asking if Brad Pitt can take Mike Tyson... They're both just actors. The Undertaker just happens to be filled with steroids.

Answer 7

Unless they wreslted in a WWF ring during a PPV =) But outside of the ring I dont think any current or past wrestlers can beat up Mike Tyson in a fight

Answer 8

I don't think the Undertaker would have gone anywhere near Tyson in his prime, if he knew whats good for him.

Answer 9

The Undertaker woud need an undertaker.....

Answer 10

what kind of dumbass question is this? the undertaker pretends to fight , Tyson fought and he fought with a capital F! let me guess you are an american.