G-D, what language do not use/have it! Atheist challenges?

Question

:)

language mean that people use it in their daily life. Please skip science, it is not a language people commonly use to talk

If they all have that world, can we conclude that G-D exist?


peace

:)

yes.. dragon exist, the thing come from Komodo, or snake with additional accessories

peace

:)

those things you mentioned are always have an explaination, that mean they are exist, with additional accesories meaning

please try harder..

peace

:)


If someone can't explain what G-D mean for him, can you conclude also that person does not have G-D!


I am not playing semantic here, just simple logic, "IF"


peace

:)

I am also with science direction mates!

I am not a blind faith, maybe you can try me to join the club :)

peace

:)

ONE more thing. If thing does not EXIST (similarity, descendent) then human do not need to give it a NAME


peace

:)

I have thumbs up you for your kindness to comments my q

peace

Answer 1

no, we can conclude that it is human nature to believe in larger omnipotent forces, but the existence of the concept of a supreme being does not logically allow for its existence

Answer 2

I puzzled why you would be rated a perfect contributor, yet I observed it replaced into basically for faith and spirituality, ordinary subjects to hold forth on. I see you're basically at point 3. all and sundry who writes of mohels isn't worth enticing in debate. your individual question marks you as an ignorant unthinking zealot. Have an unhappy life.

Answer 3

...

I read your question five times, and I still don't know what you tried to ask. Are you saying that because we speak in languages, there must ba a God?

That, my deluded friend, is absurd.

OH wait. I get it! No, actually. The Jewish say, "Yaweh", the Muslims say, "Allah", the pagans say "Lord" or "Lady".

They mean the same thing, but blue and azul mean the same thing. It only means that both cultures have a word for that particular color. Nothing noteworthy there.

Answer 4

with a deeper understanding of linguistics and philosophy and realism, you would see that you cannot base your proof of something existing purely on the fact that people use a specific word on a regular basis.
eg - most people talk about father christmas, easter bunny, faries, dragons, aliens, ghosts etc etc etc
there is no conclusive proof for nay of these, nor for god/s.
yet those who WISH to believe in them are free to do so.
as long as they do not persuade/harass/threaten/coerce/bully others into doing so too :)
blessed be

Answer 5

. And for us science works as a language that many of us understand better.
As opposed to god and creation, we find evolution and quantum physics work better for us, too. I find evolution easier to handle rather than the garden of eden, and Adan and Eve. and big bang theory, rather than god hanging around the cosmos for billions of years, or whatever.
Of course for a second language we use metaphores, and insult christians, and they insult us back and forth that way., too.
atheists, why do you say big bang, instead of creation?? Or, christians , why can't you see evolution is right, and back off with the preaching, and get off of it with that kick??
It is our way of fighting with the christians,and we both enjoy it, so MYOB. peace

Answer 6

Oh! I understand everything now! Such a clear and simple explanation.

Answer 7

gosh, that's an interesting method of determining whether or not things exist. what else must exist, according to this method? ghosts, fairies and dragons must all exist... are you happy with that?

Answer 8

No, you cannot make such a conclusion. If you knew linguistics, you would know why.

Answer 9

You seemed to have come to your own conclusion.