you're painting in a somewhat broad stroke, here.
If you mean the pornmongering fetishists, half of whom think they ARE those characters in the literal sense? Then....well, depends on what their kinks are. This is already a small percentage of what most ley men refer to as Furries. Most of whom are gay, which is almost universally denounced by all organized religions (the Bible, meanwhile, gets taken horrendously out of context in order to support this attitude).
Next in line, is the folks who think they ARE animals, and can only feel stimulated while in the suits. Creepy, but I don't think any religion has an opinion on it. Some DEAD religions, it's part of regular services, but Egyptian priests didn't think they WERE Anubis when they dressed the part, same goes for Native Americans.
Just beyond them, is the mainstay human fetishes that are exactly the same as what most people of the same range of sexual (in)activity fantasize about. Scat, BDSM, and so on. Some religions DIG the stuff, most have no opinion.
Plushophilia, where people hump altered stuffed animals, falls into masturbation, which again, every congregation of every religion handles it differently from all the others.
Finally, the utmost minority among the microscopic MINORITY of what most folks think of as furries, are the folks who need brain surgery with a .45 pistol. These are the folks with rape and slavery fantasies, pedophiles, and folks into bestiality and incest. Just about every religion has a special slice of Hell set aside for these folks, but not for their interest in cartoon animals.
MOST of the Furries are normal folks who just like to draw fuzzy people, or dress up as them to be cute or silly. In fact, there's actually alot of devout religious folks amongst the furries, of all sexual orientations. Wether their "official" religion hates alot of them for being gay or not, is irrelevant.
2007-11-08 04:52:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shamon C 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing wrong with it. If your getting off to a picture of Scruff McGruff or a sexy buff cartoon dog in a thong its just a picture. I'm more into the art then the dress up! I can draw my own porn and it is very convenient.
For the actual part of people using the whole fursuits and humping wouldn't be a sin as long as all persons are consenting. It doesn't harm anyone, just think of it as a Halloween Party gone WILD.
I'm sure God is not having a fit cause you want to dress up like a furry doggy and get freaky, but I'm sure he is having a good laugh.
2007-11-09 16:25:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by G Dogg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't honestly imagine an religion worth its salt having problems with sexual stimulation as long as all parties are consenting adults and no one is harmed. Other than that, it's nobody else's business.
2007-11-08 09:56:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by coralsnayk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sometimes I am turned on by them. But I really wouldn't go too far with that. I find the art arousing, but the actually dressing up like that is a little . . . . too much for me.
2007-11-08 01:13:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Salam
Oh really, thats like being a beast man, must be all those fairy tales you keep feeding them as kids. LOL
Sounds pretty sick to me, do they actually make the sounds and stuff, haahha that would be classic no?
2007-11-08 01:16:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think my religion has any particular stance on it, to tell the truth.
Personally? NMK.
2007-11-08 09:33:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by ArcadianStormcrow 6
·
0⤊
0⤋