What can be done to eliminate discrimination and labor violations at law firms?

Question

Why is race, sex, age, and retaliation discrimination so widespread at law firms? In recent months, law firms SulmeyerKupetz, Kaye Scholer, Jackson Lewis, Loeb and Loeb, Charlston Revich & Chamberlin and law firm supplier Chosen Few (Snow Orchard) have all been accused of discrimination against Blacks; meal period violations; and state bar violations.

Answer 1

Lawyers cannot be trusted otherwise they would had helped in the following Wrongful Termination against Sam's Club at http://daymarecometrue.bravehost.com/index.html

Answer 2

The labor commissioner can make arrests, shut companies down, yet I sat in court and an attorney for the DLSE and the Judge ruled that the DLSE did not have law enforcement powers, in contradiction to the written law. Why do you think a Judge would lie? The same reason Los Angeles Judge Barbara A. Meiers and the Los Angeles appellate division fined a Black worker $19,000 as punishment because he protested not getting 22 meal periods. The Judges also claimed that “reading and writing” at the employer’s direction did not constitute “productive” work. How many jobs can YOU do without reading and writing? Why would the Judges, who happen to be white, deny a Black worker 22 meal periods denied by white employers? Ever heard of slavery? It is not just the Imus’ and the Dog’s of the world: ten times worse than them are the Aurel Van Iderstine’s, Sherryl Wells’, Lucinander Assanahs, Robert Barnes’, James L. Perrys, Kim Millers, Joyce Mills’, Patricia Johnson’s, Phil Hacker’s, Betty McKeevers, Howard Wollitzs, Ira Revich’s, Illene Argentos’, Kirk Chamberlins’. Some of these people sit on the State Bar of California. They openly violate the labor code and the state bar rewards them by sanctioning their unlawful actions. Neither the DLSE [Schwarzennerger’s Angela Bradstreet] nor the IRS will go after wages owed by SulmeyerKupetz and Charlston Revich and Chamberlin and Chosen Few. Racism is big business, but it cannot exist without the cooperation of government officials. If the EEOC, DLSE, and State Bars refuses to revoke the certification of and shut down racist law firms, those agencies need to lose their federal funding. “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” John F. Kennedy. “Racism forments social unrest”. California Government Code

Answer 3

I somewhat have been assured with the aid of an somewhat understanding American of my acquaintance in London, that a youthful healthful toddler properly nursed is at a 12 months previous a maximum delicious, nourishing, and healthy nutrition, regardless of if stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and that i make little doubt that it will the two serve in a fricassee or a ragout. ...Jonathan speedy (1729)

Answer 4

BECAUSE THEY FEEL THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW AS A PRIVATE EMPLOYER.

AS A PRIVATE ENTERPRISE THE FEDERAL LAWS DO NOT ALWAYS APPLY.

FEDERAL LAWS OF DISCRIMINATION, FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, ONLY APPLY WHEN A FEDERAL GRANT OR MONEYS ARE USED TO SUPPORT OR SUSTAIN AND OPERATION.

THEN COMPLIANCE MUST AND WILL BE DONE BY THE USING AGENCY OF FEDERAL LAWS ON ANYTHING.

SINCE THE AGENCY IS MADE UP OF LAWYERS BY LAWYERS, THEY CAN VIOLATE THE FEDERAL STANDARDS SINCE THEY ARE SELF REGULATED.

BUT UNDER STATE LAWS, THE BUSINESS SHALL OPERATE AS A CORPORATION AND STATE LAWS FOLLOW FEDERAL LAWS AND ARE ADDRESSED AS WELL AS FEDERAL LAWS AND SOMETIMES MORE ARTICULATED.

Answer 5

Because they are attorneys....................that says it all.

Lawyers are notoriously cheap.