LOL.
2007-11-07 15:10:36 · 9 answers · asked by honk2goose 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
geez....just kidding.
2007-11-07 15:14:27 · update #1
I completely agree with "the Wise One"
2007-11-07 15:15:10 · update #2
Bigger Bombs don't mean more success, only more collateral innocent Iraqi casualties, its "boots" on the ground that will win this if allowed.
2007-11-07 22:12:21 · answer #1 · answered by conranger1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not LOL. I have Friends over there.
We are not fighting the government over there so nowhere to send "big bombs", it is like finding a needle in a hay stack. just weeding out the idiots form good Iraqi citizens.
2007-11-07 23:42:23 · answer #2 · answered by Jeff 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even if the question is a joke, the bigger bombs just do a bigger collateral damage. the troops need smarter mobms, able of distinguishing a insurgent from a civilian. - you would probably need a bomb with an human brain attached to it to manage such recognition.
2007-11-08 02:07:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think people dont realize the painstaking means our military goes through to try to prevent the loss of innocents. Can you say the same for the other side? The other side uses the loss of innocents to their advantage by setting up shop where the civilians are.
2007-11-08 09:47:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yea.. thats good in theory.. but think about killing ants.. its good and great to light the ant pile on fire, but what about when you have strey ant scattered all over your yard? do you really want to use a giant bomb that will kill only 2 or 3 ants but also kill your grass in the process?
i know you are just kidding, and yea, i agree.. the hardcore dems need to quit making us look bad. its embarassing. its unpatriotic. i blame the media.
2007-11-08 00:43:37 · answer #5 · answered by kickrocks54 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No - maybe if the dem's quit openly ridiculing the US - giving the terrorists less hope in the process
2007-11-07 23:14:14 · answer #6 · answered by Constitutional Watchdog 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
We should of never had this war in the first place. Iraq is a country that never attacked us. Why should we throw bigger bombs.
2007-11-07 23:27:52 · answer #7 · answered by Andrea 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
You say LOL, but that's not funny. We're not in this to kill innocent civilians. We are there to combat terrorism.
http://myamericantoday.blogspot.com/
2007-11-07 23:13:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is not a war it is a occupation of someones land and the way you win is get off their land
2007-11-07 23:17:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋