What do all of you think about global warming?

Question

In the past few years how much has mother nature changed where you live at right now.

Answer 1

Didn't you hear. George Bush solved this one months ago by recommending "global air conditioning."

Answer 2

Tabasco has water coming up to the roofs,
because of super evaporation from the forests ,
the clouds came from the land ,not the sea.

more than a million people are homeless ,thousands of animals dead ,crocodiles which are abundant in that area ,are scavenging the corpses.
And now the rains are moving to Chiapas.

This has never happened before .

the official world death rate related to Global Warming is 150.000 per year

There are incidents all over the planet ,but most noticible are on the climatic border lines such as on the equator and near the poles
.
The USA to date has had little effects.

Louyi lefti is blinded by the light from movies and internet texts .
he should go out in the fields ,where the real things are happening ,such as Northern China ,which now is a giant dust bowl
or near the Sahara in Northern Africa.

News Agencies are totally biased as to what is projected ,
and so are a lot of reports ,for a variety of reasons ,both political .financial and even religious.

Whether or not we can do anything about it is doubtful the whole world would have to co operate and now war seems to be a priority for global control

besides poor people have different priorities such as survival ,so even if the USA went 100 % green that would still leave the rest of the world .
But it can never do harm and can only be help full
if we became more prudent and responsible with our Natural resources ,not to waste them, to be economic with use,and safe guard the Nature we got ,to make everything last as long as possible

And people forget that we are a component of eco systems ,not a separate item ,to harm water or air i.e. Nature is to harm ourselves in the long run.

Answer 3

Not much. Winters are a little milder than they were when I was a kid in the 1960s but not by that much. I recall snowbanks over my head, but then again, I wasn't very tall then...

I believe in climate change, because the climate is ALWAYS changing and always has. The average human lifespan doesn't even register on the planet's historic timeline, thus, no one has proper perspective on the subject. They only react to what they see or remember. I do NOT believe in man-made 'global warming'.

Answer 4

Byderule,

The recent floods in Mexico are associated with a cool front that pushed all the way past the southern extreme of the Gulf of Mexico and stalled. It is not associated with global warming, it is a because of La-Nina, and is more than likely a sign that global warming has ended, if there is not enough heat at the equator from stopping a cool airmass from penetrating all the way the southern extreme of Mexico.


""Analysis: A week of heavy rains from a cold front unrelated to Tropical Storm Noel. """

http://www.gdacs.org/reports.asp?eventType=FL&ID=213&country=Mexico&location=MEX&system=asgard&alertlevel=Orange&glide_no=FL-2007-000200-MEX

Answer 5

Things in the environment are going to get crazy. That is what is prophesied in the end times. I think the whole "lets raise money to stop global warming" is a colossal waste! Nobody is going to stop anything. God said the earth will have all this stuff going on and thats the way it is!!!
Don't throw good money after bad, just have your heart right with God because He is coming VERY soon!

Thanks my sister!

Answer 6

I love it. The winters are milder and the growing season is extended. Yes the 70's were definitely colder, but then the 1850's were colder than that. The climate will do what it wants. We are oly along for the ride. We have not, and can not effect climate. We can not even make it rain when we want it to.

Answer 7

I am very worry about it. I think that many natural catastrophes as the problems in Tabasco and Chiapas have their origin in this global warming!!!

Answer 8

Inaccuracies in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth
The decision by the government to distribute Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth has been the subject of a legal action by New Party member Stewart Dimmock. Although a full ruling has yet to be given, the Court found that the film was misleading in 11 respects and that the Guidance Notes drafted by the Education Secretary’s advisors served only to exacerbate the political propaganda in the film.
In order for the film to be shown, the Government must first amend their Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that 1.) The Film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument. 2.) If teachers present the Film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination. 3.) Eleven inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.
The inaccuracies are:
· The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government’s expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
· The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
· The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one-off events to global warming.
· The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that this was not the case.
· The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr. Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
· The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant’s evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
· The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
· The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
· The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting; the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
· The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
· The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
Henry Louis Mencken (1880- 1956 )

More serious, however, has been all the evidence accumulating to show that, despite the continuing rise in CO2 levels, global temperatures in the years since 1998 have no longer been rising and may soon even be falling.
It was a telling moment when, in August, Gore's closest scientific ally, James Hansen of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, was forced to revise his influential record of US surface temperatures showing that the past decade has seen the hottest years on record. His graph now concedes that the hottest year of the 20th century was not 1998 but 1934, and that four of the 10 warmest years in the past 100 were in the 1930s.
Furthermore, scientists and academics have recently been queuing up to point out that fluctuations in global temperatures correlate more consistently with patterns of radiation from the sun than with any rise in CO2 levels, and that after a century of high solar activity, the sun's effect is now weakening, presaging a likely drop in temperatures. climate scientists and biologists from numerous sources who explain, step by step, why Al Gore and the global warming alarmists are incorrect. In some cases, blatantly so. It also provides evidence that the global warming agenda is being funded with tens of billions of dollars as a mechanism to create global governance.

NewsAccording to the new data published by NASA, 1998 is no longer the hottest year ever. 1934 is.

Four of the top 10 years of US CONUS high temperature deviations are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900. (World rankings of temperature are calculated separately.)

SO the ANSWER to YOUR QUESTION IS THEY WANT a CARBON TAX to tax evil OIL Corporations,Presidential canidate DEM Senator DODD. that means trickle down to you $8.00 a gallon Gas Higher food prices TRUCKS deliver food run on FUEL,higher electric they will build NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS its a low carbon foot print .

Answer 9

Hola Amiga,

I answered the Spanish version.

Greetings

Answer 10

THERE IS no such thing it's a fluke